[Smtk-developers] Unifying Meshing helpers between smtk and cmb.

[Yumin Yuan]

Hi Rob,

As long as the CMB_Plugin(VTKExtension + some client code) does not have a
hard-link to smtk, I am all for it. Sometimes, we/users just want to load a
reader/writer inside cmbVTKExtension to paraview, which should not require
smtk.

Also, the cmbsuperbuild then needs to tell smtk to build discrete session
by default, which is probably already the case.

Yumin

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Robert Maynard <robert.maynard at kitware.com>
wrote:

> As we know currently the smtk discrete bridge and and cmb have
> duplicate code to allow smtk to load old cmb files. Part of the
> duplicated code are the vtkCMBMeshServerLauncher and
> vtkCMBTriangleMesher classes and the supported infrastructure.
>
> What I would like to do is to remove this code duplication by
> requiring the VTKExtensions/Meshing requires the
> libvtkSMTKDiscreteExt. Does anybody have any objections to this? It
> would require that smtk to install all headers under
> bridge/discrete/extension/
> _______________________________________________
> Smtk-developers mailing list
> Smtk-developers at smtk.org
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/smtk-developers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/smtk-developers/attachments/20150410/5fb85925/attachment.html>