[Rtk-users] GPU support of PyPI package

[Simon Rit]

Hi,
Yes, v2.0.1 is the defauts (see here
<https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK/blob/master/Modules/Remote/RTK.remote.cmake>)
but you can specify another tag as pointed out by Andreas.
Best regards,
Simon

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:14 PM Andreas Andersen <andreasga22 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Clemens
> You can use the CMake variable, REMOTE_GIT_TAG_RTK, to set the tag of RTK
> you want to use, e.g. master
> I think the default value is v2.0.1
>
> Best regards
> Andreas
>
> __________________________________
>
> Andreas Gravgaard Andersen
>
> Danish Center for Particle Therapy,
>
> Aarhus University Hospital
>
> Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 99,
>
> 8200, Aarhus
>
> Mail:     agravgaard at protonmail.com
>
> Cell:      +45 3165 8140
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 20:01, C S <clem.schmid at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> I have a follow up question: When installing RTK as an ITK module as per
>> your suggestion, which RTK version is used? Is the latest release (2.0.1)
>> bundled with ITK or is the newest RTK pulled from Github?
>>
>> I ask this because I have a feeling I would benefit from using this
>> commit
>> <https://github.com/SimonRit/RTK/commit/99a6626f42e6654d11a780127610c95d3c1a063e> and
>> am wondering what's the best pratice to install it.
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much
>> Clemens
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 2:12 AM Simon Rit <simon.rit at creatis.insa-lyon.fr>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You never need this option except for using ExtractPhaseImageFilter
>>> <http://www.openrtk.org/Doxygen/classrtk_1_1ExtractPhaseImageFilter.html>
>>> but it makes the CPU version faster. So you don't need it if you only use
>>> the GPU version of FDK. I don't know anlything about ITK_USE_CUFFTW, it's a
>>> recent option I've never used...
>>> Cheers,
>>> Simon
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 11:01 PM C S <clem.schmid at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>
>>>> thank you very much for your swift answer!
>>>>
>>>> If compiling for GPU, I don't need ITK_USE_FFTWD or ITK_USE_FFTWF,
>>>> right? Would you recommend using ITK_USE_CUFFTW?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>> Clemens
>>>>
>>>> Am Di., 2. Juli 2019 um 11:56 Uhr schrieb Simon Rit <
>>>> simon.rit at creatis.insa-lyon.fr>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> No yet! We aim at proposing this soon but it's not ready. The best
>>>>> practice is to build from ITK, turn on Module_RTK, RTK_USE_CUDA and
>>>>> ITK_WRAP_PYTHON.
>>>>> Someone has already requested a proper compilation doc, we'll work on
>>>>> it asap, sorry for the inconvenience.
>>>>> Simon
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 5:51 PM C S <clem.schmid at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear RTK users,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is there a possibility to get GPU support within RTK from the PyPI
>>>>>> package "itk-rtk"?
>>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/itk-rtk/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If not, what is the current "best practice" building RTK with GPU and
>>>>>> Python bindings? I'm on Ubuntu 18.04 with CUDA 10.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you very much for your help!
>>>>>> Clemens
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Rtk-users mailing list
>>>>>> Rtk-users at public.kitware.com
>>>>>> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> Rtk-users mailing list
>> Rtk-users at public.kitware.com
>> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://public.kitware.com/pipermail/rtk-users/attachments/20190822/20422530/attachment.html>