[Rtk-users] SIRT Reconstruction
Lotte Schyns
lotte.schyns at maastro.nl
Tue Jul 18 08:02:53 EDT 2017
Thanks! I will try both the SIRT with 100 iterations and the conjugate
gradient method. What exactly are the weights (input 2) and input
support mask in rtkConjugateGradientConeBeamReconstructionFilter?
On 18-07-17 11:31, Cyril Mory wrote:
> Hi Lotte,
>
> I had a very quick look at what you are doing. It looks fine to me,
> you just need to perform way more iterations in the SIRT case. 100
> would be a good start. SIRT is more stable than SART when there are
> inconsistencies in the projection data, but converges slowly.
>
> An alternative to SIRT, which minimizes the same cost function with a
> faster algorithm, is the conjugate gradient algorithm. You should
> obtain nice results with something like 30-40 iterations (look for
> rtk::ConjugateGradientConeBeamReconstructionFilter if you want to give
> it a try).
>
> Best regards,
> Cyril
>
>
> On 18/07/2017 11:17, Lotte Schyns wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are having problems with the SIRT reconstructions. They seem very
>> strange and blurry. However, other reconstructions (SART, FDK,
>> iterativeFDK) look perfect. I uploaded an example of a SART and a SIRT
>> reconstruction (same parameters) to
>> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/7a4bkyjg43zjmy7/AAAp4tJrk9HedMEEuIKsGYDSa?dl=0.
>>
>> I also uploaded a minimalistic version of the code that I used (the
>> paths in CMakeLists.txt probably need to be adapted to your system). You
>> can alternate between SART and SIRT by changing line 143. The raw data
>> is also available on dropbox. I didn't use
>> rtkXRadRawToAttenuationImageFilter, because our projections are already
>> corrected for the dark field and flood field, so
>> (signal-dark)/(flood-dark). I just take the natural logarithm and
>> multiply by -1. Do you know what could be the problem with the SIRT
>> reconstructions? Are we using wrong parameters? Thanks for your time.
>>
>> Lotte
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rtk-users mailing list
>> Rtk-users at public.kitware.com
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
>
More information about the Rtk-users
mailing list