[Rtk-users] SimpleRTK + Matlab
Julien Jomier
julien.jomier at kitware.com
Fri Nov 4 16:42:08 EDT 2016
Hi Arvid,
Sorry for the late reply.
We successfully build the latest RTK with ITK 4.11.0 on Visual Studio
2013 with static libraries (BUILD_SHARED_LIBS set to OFF).
I have just pushed a fix to SimpleRTK to build as shared libraries. Note
that you would need to have ITK built as shared libraries as well.
Let us know if you still have any issues,
Julien
On 23/09/2016 10:29, Arvid Piehl Lauritsen Böttiger wrote:
>
> Hi again.
>
> I've been spending some more time with this, and feel I learned a little
> bit more. I have now tested this on several machines with several
> compiler versions (more or less all of them) and serveral cmake versions
> - all with Windows 7.
>
> I can actually reproduce the successful build you linked to, but this
> can only be done if you do not include any of the language wrappings,
> like in the build you linked to. Enable any of them, and the build will
> break. (see attachment)
>
> I suspect it must have been working in the past, but since none of them
> are included in your test there have been a breaking change, and none of
> them work anymore.
>
> I am still trying to tweak then projects manually to build SimpleRTK
> with some sort of language support, but still without any luck.
>
> best
>
> Arvid
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Simon Rit
> <simon.rit at creatis.insa-lyon.fr <mailto:simon.rit at creatis.insa-lyon.fr>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Sorry, I won't be able to help but I'd advise to tick on WRAP_PYTHON
> only at first in cmake, not the other languages (i.e., tick off
> WRAP_LUA).
> I can't solve your problem but Kitware is going to look into an
> upgrade of SimpleRTK in the coming days, I'll ask them if they know
> what is the issue. If you look here:
> http://my.cdash.org/viewNotes.php?buildid=1052065
> <http://my.cdash.org/viewNotes.php?buildid=1052065>
> this is a nightly build of SimpleRTK on Windows and it seems to
> work. I don't see why it wouldn't work for you.
> Simon
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Arvid Piehl Lauritsen Böttiger
> <bottiger at gmail.com <mailto:bottiger at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi again.
>
> I understand, but could you please help me get in contact with
> the person who knows something about the windows build (if any),
> I think there is something wrong.
>
> I have been investigating the build problems I had and found
> that in the sub folder "SimpleRTK-build" there is a solutions
> file with SimpleRTK. I opened it up and found the projects which
> I had problems building: "SimpleRTKCommon",
> "SimpleRTKBasicFilters0", "SimpleRTKBasicFilters1" etc.
>
> When I then tried to build SimpleRTKCommon manually it just
> compiled without any problems. However, when I followed up by
> building "SimpleRTKBasicFilters0" it gave me an error which
> stated that it couldn't find "SimpleRTKCommon-0.9.lib" - which I
> just build.
>
> After some more investigation I realized that the
> SimpleRTKCommon is set to build a dynamic linked library (DLL),
> and SimpleRTKBasicFilters0 expects it to be a static linked
> library (LIB). After changing SimpleRTKCommon to be build as a
> static library - and changing the output location - I could
> build SimpleRTKBasicFilters0.
>
> However, SimpleRTKBasicFilters0 is also build as an DLL, but
> changing that to a LIB as well I could build
> SimpleRTKBasicFilters1, then SimpleRTKBasicFilters2 and then
> SimpleRTKBasicFilters3. You get the point.
>
> I'm unsure if the intention is to build them as static or
> dynamic libraries, but in any case the current build
> configuration doesn't work - on my setup at least.
>
> However, I should note than for some reason the "lua5" project
> did build successfully out of the box. Whatever it does
> differently works.
>
> best
>
> Arvid
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Simon Rit
> <simon.rit at creatis.insa-lyon.fr
> <mailto:simon.rit at creatis.insa-lyon.fr>> wrote:
>
> I'm not an msvc specialist but your first line suggests that
> you have pasted only part of the log:
>
> 20> Done Building Project
> "C:\Users\aplb\Work\RTK\RTK1.2-bin-vs13\SimpleRTK-build\ALL_BUILD.vcxproj"
> (default targets) -- FAILED.
>
> What you need to find out is why this build failed. If the
> build fails, the linking cannot work.
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
>
> On 19/09/2016 19:44, Arvid Piehl Lauritsen Böttiger wrote:
>> I did a complete rebuild, and here is the end of the
>> output: http://pastebin.com/hvQ33WWg
>>
>> I have to admit I'm not sure what to make of it. I should
>> note that I'm trying to compile the version I just pulled
>> from git earlier today, since the other version I normally
>> work with is really old.
>>
>> best
>>
>> Arvid
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Simon Rit
>> <simon.rit at creatis.insa-lyon.fr
>> <mailto:simon.rit at creatis.insa-lyon.fr>> wrote:
>>
>> SimpleRTKCommon is a library generated when compiling.
>> Don't you have another error before that which
>> explains why it did not compile?
>> Simon
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Arvid Piehl Lauritsen
>> Böttiger <bottiger at gmail.com
>> <mailto:bottiger at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi again.
>>
>> I've been trying to get it working. However, I did
>> run into some problems compiling SimpleRTK. The
>> main issue seems to be that it depends on
>> SimpleRTKCommon - which I do not have.
>>
>> Here is the last few lines from VS2013
>>
>> > 5>LINK : fatal error LNK1181: cannot open input
>> file '..\..\..\lib\Debug\SimpleRTKCommon-0.9.lib'
>> [C:\Users\aplb\Work\RTK\RTK1.2-
>> >
>> bin-vs13\SimpleRTK-build\Code\IO\src\SimpleRTKIO.vcxproj]
>> > 5>
>> > 5> 0 Warning(s)
>> > 5> 2 Error(s)
>> > 5>
>> > 5> Time Elapsed 00:00:25.26
>> > ========== Build: 4 succeeded, 1 failed, 0
>> up-to-date, 0 skipped ==========
>>
>> I'm not quite sure what is going on, because the
>> only reference I can find to SimpleRTKCommon is
>> the CMakeLists.txt on github:
>> https://github.com/SimonRit/RTK/blob/master/utilities/SimpleRTK/CMakeLists.txt
>> <https://github.com/SimonRit/RTK/blob/master/utilities/SimpleRTK/CMakeLists.txt>
>>
>> best
>>
>> Arvid
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Simon Rit
>> <simon.rit at creatis.insa-lyon.fr
>> <mailto:simon.rit at creatis.insa-lyon.fr>> wrote:
>>
>> The latest MacOS. It's nice if you can test it
>> on other platforms, I'll try to run it on
>> Linux but I have to upgrade matlab first (I
>> think python calls are available starting with
>> Matlab 2014).
>> Simon
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Arvid Piehl
>> Lauritsen Böttiger <bottiger at gmail.com
>> <mailto:bottiger at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Simon
>>
>> This look very interesting! Which platform
>> did you successfully execute this on?
>> I will give it a try at once (on windows)
>> and let you know if I run into any problems.
>>
>> best
>>
>> Arvid
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Simon
>> Rit <simon.rit at creatis.insa-lyon.fr
>> <mailto:simon.rit at creatis.insa-lyon.fr>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear RTK users,
>> I have quickly tested calling the
>> SimpleRTK python lib from Matlab and
>> it seems to work well:
>> http://wiki.openrtk.org/index.php/SimpleRTK#Matlab
>> <http://wiki.openrtk.org/index.php/SimpleRTK#Matlab>
>> Therefore, I don't think we have to
>> work on Matlab wrappings but let us
>> know if you think otherwise.
>> Future works include a simple
>> installation mechanism for
>> pre-compiled SimpleRTK libraries.
>> We'll keep you posted!
>> Simon
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rtk-users mailing list
>> Rtk-users at public.kitware.com
>> <mailto:Rtk-users at public.kitware.com>
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
>> <http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rtk-users mailing list
> Rtk-users at public.kitware.com
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
>
More information about the Rtk-users
mailing list