[Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Measure graphics performance?

Fri Mar 25 10:02:29 EDT 2016

It is still in
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/692 which
hasn't been merged yet because we have a few changes left to make in it. It
would be great if you could try it and comment in the gitlab review on
anything you find.

I expect it will be merged next week. Note that although this won't show up
in a release until ParaView 7.1, it is possible to copy to use with older
ParaViews.

David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engineer
21 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-881-4909

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY
RDECOM ARL (US) <richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil> wrote:

> Pointer?   I’m searching through the repository and I don’t see it.
>
> ________________________________
> Rick Angelini
> USArmy Research Laboratory
> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
> Phone:  410-278-6266
>
> From: David E DeMarle <dave.demarle at kitware.com>
> Date: Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 4:17 PM
> To: Rick Angelini <Richard.C.Angelini.CIV at mail.mil>
> Cc: ParaView <paraview at paraview.org>
> Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Paraview] Measure graphics performance?
>
> All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the
> identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained
> within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web
> browser.
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> Not sure what you mean by new_benchmark.py. You should run
> benchmark/manyspheres.py.
>
> It takes resolution and numspheres arguments. numspheres is the total
> number of objects in the scene and each processors makes a diffent set of
> them. Resolution is the phi&theta resolution of each that controls the
> number of polygons each sphere has.
>
>
>
>
>
> David E DeMarle
> Kitware, Inc.
> R&D Engineer
> 21 Corporate Drive
> Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
> Phone: 518-881-4909
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY
> RDECOM ARL (US) <richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil < Caution-
> mailto:richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil <richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil>
>  > > wrote:
>
>> Dave – I’m running the new_benchmark.py script from the command line
>>
>> pvpython new_benchmark.py
>>
>>
>> Is there a way to jack up the number of polygons that the script
>> generates?
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Rick Angelini
>> USArmy Research Laboratory
>> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
>> Phone:  410-278-6266 < tel:410-278-6266 >
>>
>> From: David E DeMarle <dave.demarle at kitware.com < Caution-
>> mailto:dave.demarle at kitware.com <dave.demarle at kitware.com> > >
>> Date: Monday, March 21, 2016 at 1:08 PM
>> To: Rick Angelini <Richard.C.Angelini.CIV at mail.mil < Caution-
>> mailto:Richard.C.Angelini.CIV at mail.mil <Richard.C.Angelini.CIV at mail.mil>
>>  > >
>> Cc: ParaView <paraview at paraview.org < Caution-
>> mailto:paraview at paraview.org <paraview at paraview.org> > >
>> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Paraview] Measure graphics performance?
>>
>> All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the
>> identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained
>> within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web
>> browser.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>> At the VTK single node level, enable Module_vtkUtilitiesBenchmarks module
>> in cmake, compile and run bin/TimingTests
>>
>> At the ParaView multiple node level, Chuck Atkins is nearly done with
>> revamping the old benchmark.py and adding to it a simple canonical test
>> script that uses the programmable filter to make arbitrarily large meshes
>> to test parallel rendering with. That can be found at: Caution-Caution-
>> https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/692
>>  < Caution-
>> https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/692
>>  >  < Caution-Caution-
>> https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/692
>>  < Caution-
>> https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/692 >  >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> David E DeMarle
>> Kitware, Inc.
>> R&D Engineer
>> 21 Corporate Drive
>> Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
>> Phone: 518-881-4909 < tel:518-881-4909 >
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY
>> RDECOM ARL (US)<richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil < Caution-
>> mailto:richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil <richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil>
>>  >  < Caution-Caution-mailto:richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil
>> <richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil> < Caution-
>> mailto:richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil <richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil>
>>  >  > > wrote:
>>
>>> I need to do some quick performance tests to compare the results between
>>> two graphics cards using “real world” applications.   Do you guys have a
>>> benchmark handy to measure interactive graphics performance???????
>>> ________________________________
>>> Rick Angelini
>>> USArmy Research Laboratory
>>> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
>>> Phone:  410-278-6266 < tel:410-278-6266 >  < tel:410-278-6266 < tel:
>>> 410-278-6266 >  >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by Caution-Caution-www.kitware.com < Caution-
>>> http://Caution-Caution-www.kitware.com >  < Caution-Caution-
>>> http://www.kitware.com < Caution-http://www.kitware.com >  >
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at Caution-Caution-
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html < Caution-
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >  < Caution-Caution-
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html < Caution-
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >  >
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>> Caution-Caution-http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView < Caution-
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >  < Caution-Caution-
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView < Caution-
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >  >
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: Caution-Caution-
>>> http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView < Caution-
>>> http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView >  < Caution-Caution-
>>> http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView < Caution-
>>> http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView >  >
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> Caution-Caution-http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>  < Caution-http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>  >  < Caution-Caution-
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview < Caution-
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview >  >
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20160325/11569b8c/attachment.html>