[Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Measure graphics performance?

Fri Mar 25 08:02:30 EDT 2016

Pointer?   I’m searching through the repository and I don’t see it.

________________________________
Rick Angelini
USArmy Research Laboratory
CISD/HPC Architectures Team
Phone:  410-278-6266

From: David E DeMarle <dave.demarle at kitware.com<mailto:dave.demarle at kitware.com>>
Date: Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 4:17 PM
To: Rick Angelini <Richard.C.Angelini.CIV at mail.mil<mailto:Richard.C.Angelini.CIV at mail.mil>>
Cc: ParaView <paraview at paraview.org<mailto:paraview at paraview.org>>
Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Paraview] Measure graphics performance?

All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.

________________________________

Not sure what you mean by new_benchmark.py. You should run benchmark/manyspheres.py.

It takes resolution and numspheres arguments. numspheres is the total number of objects in the scene and each processors makes a diffent set of them. Resolution is the phi&theta resolution of each that controls the number of polygons each sphere has.

David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engineer
21 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-881-4909

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) <richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil<mailto:richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil> < Caution-mailto:richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil > > wrote:
Dave – I’m running the new_benchmark.py script from the command line

pvpython new_benchmark.py

Is there a way to jack up the number of polygons that the script generates?

________________________________
Rick Angelini
USArmy Research Laboratory
CISD/HPC Architectures Team
Phone:  410-278-6266 < tel:410-278-6266 >

From: David E DeMarle <dave.demarle at kitware.com<mailto:dave.demarle at kitware.com> < Caution-mailto:dave.demarle at kitware.com > >
Date: Monday, March 21, 2016 at 1:08 PM
To: Rick Angelini <Richard.C.Angelini.CIV at mail.mil<mailto:Richard.C.Angelini.CIV at mail.mil> < Caution-mailto:Richard.C.Angelini.CIV at mail.mil > >
Cc: ParaView <paraview at paraview.org<mailto:paraview at paraview.org> < Caution-mailto:paraview at paraview.org > >
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Paraview] Measure graphics performance?

All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.

________________________________

At the VTK single node level, enable Module_vtkUtilitiesBenchmarks module in cmake, compile and run bin/TimingTests

At the ParaView multiple node level, Chuck Atkins is nearly done with revamping the old benchmark.py and adding to it a simple canonical test script that uses the programmable filter to make arbitrarily large meshes to test parallel rendering with. That can be found at: Caution-Caution-https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/692 < Caution-https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/692 >  < Caution-Caution-https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/692 < Caution-https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/692 >  >

David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engineer
21 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-881-4909 < tel:518-881-4909 >

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)<richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil<mailto:richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil> < Caution-mailto:richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil >  < Caution-Caution-mailto:richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil < Caution-mailto:richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil >  > > wrote:
I need to do some quick performance tests to compare the results between two graphics cards using “real world” applications.   Do you guys have a benchmark handy to measure interactive graphics performance???????
________________________________
Rick Angelini
USArmy Research Laboratory
CISD/HPC Architectures Team
Phone:  410-278-6266 < tel:410-278-6266 >  < tel:410-278-6266 < tel:410-278-6266 >  >

_______________________________________________
Powered by Caution-Caution-www.kitware.com < Caution-http://Caution-Caution-www.kitware.com >  < Caution-Caution-http://www.kitware.com < Caution-http://www.kitware.com >  >

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at Caution-Caution-http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html < Caution-http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >  < Caution-Caution-http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html < Caution-http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >  >

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: Caution-Caution-http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView < Caution-http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >  < Caution-Caution-http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView < Caution-http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >  >

Search the list archives at: Caution-Caution-http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView < Caution-http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView >  < Caution-Caution-http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView < Caution-http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView >  >

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
Caution-Caution-http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview < Caution-http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview >  < Caution-Caution-http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview < Caution-http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview >  >

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20160325/5602468e/attachment.html>