[Paraview] Required CMake version 3.5

[Cory Quammen]

Hi Christoph,

Thanks for the information, and again, thanks for your hard work
packaging ParaView.

Best regards,
Cory



On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Christoph Grüninger <foss at grueninger.de> wrote:
> Hi Cory,
> thanks for link to the developer mailing list discussion. I think CMake 3.3 is better then
> 3.5, because at least the last Leap 42.1 release provides that.
> I patched ParaView to require CMake 3.0 and it builds fine. I will package ParaView 5.1
> that way and hope you reduce the requirement to CMake 3.3 for the next time.
>
>> Based on that discussion, loosening the requirement to CMake 3.0 does
>> not appear to be feasible.
>
> CMake 3.0 helped to clean some code paths, nothing really complicated. You have
> to check whether you can get other improvements from newer CMake version by
> copying the relevant parts and calling that instead of the built-in functions.
> So 3.0 might be feasible and reasonable.
>
> Bye
> Christoph



-- 
Cory Quammen
R&D Engineer
Kitware, Inc.