[Paraview] Differences between OpenGL and OpenGL2 versions of ParaView

Utkarsh Ayachit utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com
Thu Nov 19 09:05:10 EST 2015


Yes, I am noticing that slowness too. Ken, mind taking a look at that? 

Utkarsh 



> On Nov 19, 2015, at 12:38 AM, Adam Lyon <lyon at fnal.gov> wrote:
> 
> Indeed you are right! I see the rendering you show for 5.0. Interesting change with regard to setting the solid color first. 
> 
> One thing I should note is that image manipulation (pan, zoom, rotate) is quite slow in 5.0 compared to 4.4. For example, rotating the ring with a solid color, I get frame-rates  (from the annotation text) of over 100 fps with 4.4. With 5.0 I generally see about 20-25fps.  Do you see this too? Thanks again!! -- Adam
> 
> ------
> 
> Adam L. Lyon
> Scientist; Associate Division Head for Systems for Scientific Applications
> 
> Scientific Computing Division & Muon g-2 Experiment
> Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
> 630 840 5522 office
> www.fnal.gov
> lyon at fnal.gov
> 
> Connect with us!
> Newsletter  |  Facebook  |  Twitter
> 
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
>> Ken, what Adam has is a multiblock dataset with field data array named "Color" (with certain blocks missing this array). Now when you color by this array and then uncheck "Map Scalars", I get the attached images. I'd contend that 5.0 with OpenGL2 rendering is correct. In 4.4 it would just bleed some random color through for blocks with missing "Color" array. In 5.0, the color used is the "Solid Color" set before changing the array to color with.
>> 
>> Adam, are you not seeing rendering as I am with 5.0? I no longer get rendering similar to the images you reported.
>> 
>> Utkarsh
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20151119/a1e0db6a/attachment.html>


More information about the ParaView mailing list