[Paraview] pvserver test on different systems (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Su, Simon M CTR USARMY ARL (US)]

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Thank you very much Utkarsh.
-simon

-----Original Message-----
From: Utkarsh Ayachit [mailto:utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 3:22 PM
To: Su, Simon M CTR USARMY ARL (US)
Cc: paraview at paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] pvserver test on different systems (UNCLASSIFIED)

Simon,

Yup, that'd be a perfect test (attached).

You should run it with pvbatch.

Utkarsh



On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Su, Simon M CTR USARMY ARL (US) 
<simon.m.su.ctr at mail.mil> wrote:
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
> Hello,
>
> We have several HPC systems that we compile/install different ParaView
> releases. We are wondering what would be a good test to verify that
> pvserver compiled is actually running on the system. Is there like a
> python script that when we run on the new installation, and it worked,
> we have a good confidence that the compilation/installation of the
> ParaView released is working? Will "a plot of a sphere + the process
> id scalar filter + save output to image = beach ball image" a good 
> verification test?
>
> Thanks
> -simon
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5633 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20141014/7947e5ce/attachment-0001.bin>