[Paraview] PV-3.98-RC binary error

[Utkarsh Ayachit]

Carlo,

I am afraid this is not the segfault my email was referring to. Could
you try removing (or copy them over somewhere) any config files in
${HOME}/.config/ParaView  and see if that makes a difference?

Utkarsh

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Carlo <cfq20 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit <at> kitware.com> writes:
>
>>
>>
>> There is fix to be included in next release candidate that could
> potentially address this problem (we are seeing segfaults on some
> linux platforms during initialization). I'd suggest waiting for the
>  next release candidate and giving it a try. I don't think it has
>  anything to do with your installed Qt since ParaView binary
> packages it's own Qt.
>>
>>
>>
>> Utkarsh
>>
>
>
> Dear Utkarsh,
>
> I just googled "paraview 3.98 utkarsh" and found this conversation. I just
> installed the binaries for Paraview 3.98 for Linux 64 bit and get a slightly
> different segmentation fault as soon as I execute the paraview binary. I
> copy it below. Any guidance on how to resolve this would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> Many thanks,
> Carlo
>
> /opt/ParaView-3.98.0-Linux-64bit/bin/paraview
> ERROR: In /home/utkarsh/Dashboards/MyTests/NightlyMaster/ParaView
> Superbuild-Release/paraview/src/paraview/ParaViewCore/
> ServerImplementation/Core/vtkSIProxyDefinitionManager.cxx, line 565
> vtkSIProxyDefinitionManager (0xfdc000): No proxy that matches:
> group=cameramanipulators and proxy=None were found.
>
>
> Segmentation fault
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview