[Paraview] [EXTERNAL] extract CTH parts (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY ARL (US)]

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Sorry - can you give me some details about how to apply the patch?    I can
apply this to 4.0.1?

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: paraview-bounces at paraview.org [mailto:paraview-bounces at paraview.org]
On Behalf Of Utkarsh Ayachit
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 1:14 PM
To: Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY ARL (US)
Cc: paraview at paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] [EXTERNAL] extract CTH parts (UNCLASSIFIED)

Rick/Alan,

Can you guys try the attached patch to see if the holes issue is fixed? I am
going to further cleanup the filter, but I want to make sure the holes were
indeed caused by this particular bug before I change more code.

Thanks
Utkarsh

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY ARL
(US) <richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil> wrote:
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
> Terrific - thanks for the update.    Very much appreciate the feedback.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Utkarsh Ayachit [mailto:utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 11:51 AM
> To: Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY ARL (US)
> Cc: Scott, W Alan; paraview at paraview.org
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] [EXTERNAL] extract CTH parts (UNCLASSIFIED)
>
> I was able to reproduce a hole with ExtractCTHParts filter using a 
> dataset I have. I'll dig deeper and keep you posted.
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV 
> USARMY ARL
> (US) <richard.c.angelini.civ at mail.mil> wrote:
>> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>> Caveats: NONE
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestions ....
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Utkarsh Ayachit [mailto:utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:44 AM
>> To: Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY ARL (US)
>> Cc: Scott, W Alan; paraview at paraview.org
>> Subject: Re: [Paraview] [EXTERNAL] extract CTH parts (UNCLASSIFIED)
>>
>>> Interactively
>>> viewing the data, all of the timesteps are valid -  is there a 
>>> memory leak or something similar that's causing the renderer to hose up?
>>
>> I'll try to do some profiling to see if I can reproduce this. In the 
>> mean time, can you try turning off display lists, i.e. turn on "Use 
>> Immediate Mode Rendering" from the Settings Dialog's "Render View"
>> page? If that doesn't help, also try turning off "Use Offscreen 
>> Rendering for Screenshots" from the same dialog.
>>
>> Utkarsh
>>
>> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>> Caveats: NONE
>>
>>
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
>

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6800 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20130828/d59b33c8/attachment.bin>