[Paraview] vtkCompositeDataIterator and GoToFirstItem()

[Paul Edwards]

You might want to check
vtkCompositeDataIterator::IsDoneWithTraversal() to make sure you stay
within the bounds.

Regards,
Paul

On 31 March 2010 18:41, Paul Edwards <paul.m.edwards at gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you need to call InitTraversal first?
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
> On 31 March 2010 17:30, Adriano Gagliardi <agagliardi at ara.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, I forgot to mention that. The seg fault occurs when the new
>> vtkCompositeDataIterator is created at i=1. I just realised the first block
>> of code I posted was wrong anyway. This is the correct (but not working)
>> routine:
>>
>>       for ( vtkIdType i = 0; i != max; ++i ) {
>>         vtkCompositeDataIterator* iter = test->NewIterator();
>>         iter->GoToFirstItem();
>>         for ( int j = 0; j != test->GetNumberOfBlocks(); ++j ) {
>>           //do something here
>>
>>            iter->GoToNextItem();
>>         }
>>         iter->Delete();
>>       }
>>
>> I'm assuming that what I'm trying just isn't possible, but it would be nice
>> to know if there is a way of achieving this.
>>
>> Adriano
>>
>> ===================================
>>
>> Adriano Gagliardi MEng PhD
>> Business Sector Leader
>> Computational Aerodynamics
>> Aircraft Research Association Ltd.
>> Manton Lane
>> Bedford
>>
>> Tel: 01234 32 4644
>> E-mail: agagliardi at ara.co.uk
>> Url: www.ara.co.uk
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Utkarsh Ayachit [mailto:utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com]
>> Sent: 31 March 2010 17:23
>> To: agagliardi at ara.co.uk
>> Cc: ParaView
>> Subject: Re: [Paraview] vtkCompositeDataIterator and GoToFirstItem()
>>
>> You might want to attach a debugger and produce a stack trace to see where
>> you are getting a segfault.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Adriano Gagliardi <agagliardi at ara.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm using the vtkCompositeDataIterator to iterate over a multiblock
>>> data-set multiple times. I'd like to reuse the iterator I create in
>>> the first instance by using GoToFirstItem after it has finished the
>>> traversal, but I'm getting a segmentation fault. Is this possible or am I
>> doing this wrong?
>>> Example code below:
>>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It works when the for loops are switched around. I'm just interested
>>> to see what the performance difference is between them:
>>>
>>>        vtkCompositeDataIterator* iter = test->NewIterator();
>>>      iter->GoToFirstItem();
>>>        for ( int j = 0; j != test->GetNumberOfBlocks(); ++j ) {
>>>        for ( vtkIdType i = 0; i != max; ++i ) {
>>>          //do something here
>>>        }
>>>        iter->GoToNextItem();
>>>      }
>>>      iter->Delete();
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Adriano
>>>
>>> ===================================
>>>
>>> Adriano Gagliardi MEng PhD
>>> Business Sector Leader
>>> Computational Aerodynamics
>>> Aircraft Research Association Ltd.
>>> Manton Lane
>>> Bedford
>>>
>>> Tel: 01234 32 4644
>>> E-mail: agagliardi at ara.co.uk
>>> Url: www.ara.co.uk
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------
>>> This email contains information that is private and confidential and is
>> intended only for the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient
>> please delete it and notify us immediately by e-mailing the sender.
>>> Note: All email sent to or from this address may be accessed by someone
>> other than the recipient, for system management and security reasons.
>>> Aircraft Research Association Ltd.  Registered in England,
>>> Registration No 503668 Registered Office: Manton Lane, Bedford MK41
>>> 7PF England VAT No GB 196351245
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------
>> This email contains information that is private and confidential and is intended only for the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify us immediately by e-mailing the sender.
>> Note: All email sent to or from this address may be accessed by someone other than the recipient, for system management and security reasons.
>> Aircraft Research Association Ltd.  Registered in England, Registration No 503668 Registered Office: Manton Lane, Bedford MK41 7PF England VAT No GB 196351245
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
>