[Paraview] [Paraview-developers] Development Install Tree

[Dave Partyka]

Yeah, I am trying to fix the compile errors right now.

Can you report these as bugs? The missing files should be easy to fix.
Correcting the path in the libraries will take a little bit to track down
why they have the wrong path or creating a tool that will run
installl_name_tool and fix them.

Thanks!

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Eric E. Monson <emonson at cs.duke.edu> wrote:

> Hey Dave,
>
> When building (and packaging) branded apps, is there any advantage to or
> difference between building against the development tree that's generated
> through this process vs a "non-installed" local ParaView build?
>
> So far (on OS X 10.6.2) I've run into a couple problems building against
> the installed development tree {Oh, caveat, this is the CVS from 2010-03-03
> because I had build errors when trying yesterday evening's code...}:
>
> 1. pq3DWidgetImplementation.cxx.in and pq3DWidgetImplementation.h.in are
> missing from [installRoot]/include/paraview-3.7/Qt/Components/
>
> 2. The library paths in the applications installed in [installRoot]/bin/
> aren't correct, so when I try to build a branded app against this tree, the
> first thing I run into is:
>
> dyld: Library not loaded: libvtkCommon.pv3.7.dylib
>  Referenced from: /usr/local/ParaView/bin/kwProcessXML
>  Reason: image not found
>
> If I run "otool -L" on kwProcessXML (or on any app in that directory), the
> library paths don't point to the correct lib directories:
>
> emo2:/usr/local/ParaView/bin> otool -L kwProcessXML
> kwProcessXML:
>        libvtkCommon.pv3.7.dylib (compatibility version 0.0.0, current
> version 0.0.0)
>        libvtksys.pv3.7.dylib (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version
> 0.0.0)
>        /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current
> version 123.0.0)
>        /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib (compatibility version 7.0.0, current
> version 7.9.0)
>
> Thanks for all the good work,
> -Eric
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Eric E Monson
> Duke Visualization Technology Group
>
>
> On Mar 4, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Dave Partyka wrote:
>
> > Greetings Everyone,
> >
> > I have recently commited a fair amount of changes to ParaView that lets a
> developer create a functional development tree that could be distributed.
> The development tree includes all the necessary headers, libraries, CMake
> files and executable tools one would need for developing ParaView branded
> applications and Plugins without building your own ParaView.
> >
> > In order to create this tree you simply need to enable
> PARAVIEW_INSTALL_DEVELOPMENT when configuring ParaView with CMake.
> Afterwards if you do a make install (linux/mac) or build the INSTALL target
> (windows), a development tree will be installed at CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX. If
> you wish to distribute a development package, running CPack with
> PARAVIEW_INSTALL_DEVELOPMENT turned on will also include the development
> tree.
> >
> > For Example:
> >
> > cpack -G NSIS --config
> C:\Kitware\ParaView3\bin\Applications\ParaView\CPackParaViewConfig.cmake -C
> Release
> >
> > Just about all of the bugs related to the development install feature
> have been fixed. If anyone has any issues with them please feel free to
> report a bug.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > _______________________________________________
> > Paraview-developers mailing list
> > Paraview-developers at paraview.org
> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20100305/240e1b43/attachment-0001.htm>