[Paraview] CoProcessing

Jacques Papper jacques.papper at gmail.com
Wed Aug 4 11:58:41 EDT 2010


Thanks a lot Andy, Takuya,

I'm using the PhastaAdaptor, and the FortranAdaptorAPI as a guide for the
moment.
I know there were talks of getting POLYHEDRAL cell support in VTK. Do you
know if this is there yet?
My dataset is multiregion unstructured polyhedral mesh domain decomposed
amongst each processor.

Is the Phasta code parallelized ? If so, I do not see any MPI statements in
the adaptor code ?

Jacques

2010/8/4 Andy Bauer <andy.bauer at kitware.com>

> Hi Jacques,
>
> What type of data set do you have?  Even though the PHASTA adaptor (
> ParaView/CoProcessing/Adaptors/FortranAdaptors/PhastaAdaptor) is for fortran
> code it may give you an idea.  Also stepping through the example in
> ParaView/CoProcessing/CoProcessor/Testing/Cxx/PythonScriptCoProcessingExample.cxx
> may help as well.
>
> I'll spend some time this week putting up a skeleton of a simulation code
> on the coprocessing wiki that should hopefully be easier to follow.  I'll
> let you know when it's done.
>
> Andy
>
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Jacques Papper <jacques.papper at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Sorry for my last post, I figured out that I had wrongly set my
>> PYTHONPATH..
>> All the tests work ok now. Still interested in CoProcessing adaptors
>> examples though :)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Jacques
>>
>> 2010/8/4 Jacques Papper <jacques.papper at gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I'm starting to look into the ParaView CoProcessing libraries.
>>> I just pulled from git today, and compiled it all up following the
>>> guidelines in :
>>> http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/CoProcessing
>>> I didn't find :
>>> *BUILD_PYTHON_COPROCESSING_ADAPTOR
>>> *but instead :
>>> PARAVIEW_BUILD_PLUGIN_CoProcessingScriptGenerator
>>> anyway the compilation went through without any issues.
>>> I then tried :
>>>
>>> ctest -R CoProcessing
>>> Test project /users/boreas01/jacques/PARAVIEW/ParaView-bin
>>>     Start 491: CoProcessingTestPythonScript
>>> 1/3 Test #491: CoProcessingTestPythonScript ...........   Passed    0.45
>>> sec
>>>     Start 492: CoProcessingPythonScriptGridPlot
>>> 2/3 Test #492: CoProcessingPythonScriptGridPlot .......***Failed    0.09
>>> sec
>>>     Start 493: CoProcessingPythonScriptPressurePlot
>>> 3/3 Test #493: CoProcessingPythonScriptPressurePlot ...***Failed    0.09
>>> sec
>>>
>>> 33% tests passed, 2 tests failed out of 3
>>>
>>> Total Test time (real) =   0.68 sec
>>>
>>> The following tests FAILED:
>>>         492 - CoProcessingPythonScriptGridPlot (Failed)
>>>         493 - CoProcessingPythonScriptPressurePlot (Failed)
>>> Errors while running CTest
>>>
>>> Is this a problem in my current installation or on the master branch ?
>>>
>>> Finally, I would like to start writing an adaptor to a C++ parallelised
>>> code. Can you tell me what is the closest code I can inspire myself from ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>> PS sorry mixed up the subjects..
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20100804/cc6cc937/attachment.htm>


More information about the ParaView mailing list