[Paraview] Portable formats

[j s]

Please change the mailing list so the default "reply to" is the list and not
the person who last responded.

I realized my mistake once it was already sent, but I didn't follow up to
the list since I figured you'd reply to the list if you thought it warranted
public attention.

Juan

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Berk Geveci <berk.geveci at kitware.com>wrote:

> Hi Juan,
>
> Please direct your questions to the ParaView mailing list instead of
> me. I believe that we will have some sort of CGNS support in the next
> release. It may take some time to mature though.
>
> -berk
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:45 PM, j s <j.s4403 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am from the TCAD field, which is CFD related.  Unfortunately it has
> always
> > been based on proprietary data formats.  Thanks for pointing out CGNS.  I
> > had no idea paraview would be supporting it.  What time frame were you
> > expecting for CGNS support in your tool.
> >
> > Juan
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Berk Geveci <berk.geveci at kitware.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > Thanks for your response.  I guess I was talking about visualization.
> >> >  Would
> >> > Ensight be considered an industry standard?
> >>
> >> As close as you will get to a standard. If you are in the CFD field,
> >> you may want to look into CGNS too. We will have CGNS support
> >> relatively soon.
> >>
> >> -berk
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:53 PM, j s <j.s4403 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Thanks for your response.  I guess I was talking about visualization.
> >> >  Would
> >> > Ensight be considered an industry standard?
> >> >
> >> > Juan
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Berk Geveci <berk.geveci at kitware.com
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> What do you mean by portable? Across visualization applications or
> >> >> across platforms? Across visualization applications, you best bet is
> >> >> probably EnSight.
> >> >>
> >> >> -berk
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:56 PM, j s <j.s4403 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Hello,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I was wondering what everyone would consider to be the most
> portable
> >> >> > format
> >> >> > for:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 1. multi-zone
> >> >> > 2. unstructured
> >> >> > 3. 2d or 3d
> >> >> >
> >> >> > mesh data.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks Everyone,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Juan
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > ParaView mailing list
> >> >> > ParaView at paraview.org
> >> >> > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20090121/044ea16d/attachment.htm>