[Paraview] ParaView Digest, Vol 68, Issue 21

[Utkarsh Ayachit]

I've started a bug on the bug-tracker collecting all current
installation issues. Everyone's encouraged to add their installation
woes to this list.

http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=9998

Utkarsh

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Michael Wild <themiwi at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just for the record:
>
> When you do so, please remember that Qt-cocoa needs the qt_menu.nib
> directory in the Resources. Also, I think I had trouble with
> QT_QTCLUCENE_LIBRARY not being included in the bundle and a missing empty
> qt.conf file (to prevent Qt from loading png/tiff plugins).
>
> Michael
>
>
> On 4. Dec, 2009, at 18:00 , paraview-request at paraview.org wrote:
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:54:53 -0500
>> From: Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Paraview] cpack not adapted yet to branding commit?
>> To: Sven Buijssen <sven.buijssen at tu-dortmund.de>
>> Cc: "paraview at paraview.org" <paraview at paraview.org>
>> Message-ID:
>>        <7ba9d6a30912040854w11cd27b6he960579654e453f at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> Sven,
>>
>> If I remember correctly, in my emails I did mention that the
>> installation rules are broken and they will be fixed soon (~ 1 month).
>> We are planning on a general cleanup and restructuring of the install
>> rules to make sure it packages are generated correctly on all
>> platforms.
>>
>> Utkarsh
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Sven Buijssen
>> <sven.buijssen at tu-dortmund.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I noticed that since Utkarsh branding commit the tar/rpm-packages created
>>> by
>>> means of 'make package'/'cpack -G TGZ'/... at the end of a nightly
>>> automatic
>>> build are considerably smaller, 30-50% depending on the architecture. In
>>> particular, they do not contain a paraview binary any more, but in the
>>> bin
>>> subdirectory merely:
>>>
>>> bin/lproj
>>> bin/pvbatch
>>> bin/pvdataserver
>>> bin/pvpython
>>> bin/pvrenderserver
>>> bin/pvserver
>>> bin/smTestDriver
>>>
>>> Happens with cmake 2.6.4 and 2.8.0 on 6 different Unix platforms.
>>>
>>> ParaView itself builds just fine on these platforms (by now), it's just
>>> that the
>>> packaging mechanism seems to be broken. Given that Utkarsh's pre- and
>>> post-branding commit mails on the developer mailing list nor the pdf
>>> attachment
>>> listing the internal document
>>>
>>> http://www.paraview.org/ParaView3/index.php/ParaView-based_Applications mentions
>>> changes in the cpack mechanism, can anyone confirm my observation?
>>>
>>> Sven
>>>
>
>