[Paraview] (no subject)

[Hom Nath Gharti]

One possible reason may be the different order of the data.

Looks like your original data stored in the order (Row major format):

for i=
      for j=
            for k=

But paraview is reading as (Column major format):

for k=
       for j=
             for i=

If this is the case, you should write the data in correct order.

Good luck!


On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Lester Anderson <
lester_anderson1963 at hotmail.com> wrote:

>  Hello all
>
> I have started to compile myhuge dataset and I noticed a bit of a problem
> in terms of the coordinates, as indicated by the cube axes. I have attached
> a couple small jpegs to show what I mean. PV_test1.JPG is a screenshot from
> Paraview and PV_test2.jpg is a image from SURFER where I gridded the data up
> from XYZ files. The data in SURFER are gridded and oriented correctly with
> respect to the axes whereas the data as displayed in Paraview are rotated by
> 90 degrees it seems. This is the header file I have used to test the data:
>
> # vtk DataFile Version 3.0
> vtk output
> ASCII
> DATASET STRUCTURED_POINTS
> DIMENSIONS 151 151 2
> SPACING 200 -200 -100
> ORIGIN 291024 2055975 0
> POINT_DATA 45602
> SCALARS density double
> LOOKUP_TABLE default
> 2.28
> 2.28
> 2.28
>
> Any ideas how I can get the data oriented correctly to match the output of
> SURFER?
>
> Thanks
>
> Lester
>
> ------------------------------
> For the best free wallpapers from MSN Click here!<http://wallpapers.msn.com/?ocid=%5BB001MSN42A0716B%5D>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ParaView mailing list
> ParaView at paraview.org
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20081031/33608877/attachment.htm>