[Paraview] Loading data PV2.x versus PV3

Berk Geveci berk.geveci at kitware.com
Fri Jan 18 17:17:22 EST 2008


Sounds good to me :-)

On 1/18/08, Moreland, Kenneth <kmorel at sandia.gov> wrote:
> Berk,
>
> I am working on an extension for the file series reader class that deals
> with data readers that support time.  It might work for this instance,
> too.
>
> -Ken
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: paraview-bounces+kmorel=sandia.gov at paraview.org
> [mailto:paraview-
> > bounces+kmorel=sandia.gov at paraview.org] On Behalf Of Berk Geveci
> > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 2:39 PM
> > To: Jose Renteria (Cont, ARL/CISD)
> > Cc: xdmf at lists.kitware.com; paraview at paraview.org
> > Subject: Re: [Paraview] Loading data PV2.x versus PV3
> >
> > It is. However, this is easy to fix. Do we need to have file series
> > support for Xdmf? Jerry is adding support for time to the Xdmf format.
> > If we support file series, which one has priority, native time or file
> > series?
> >
> > -berk
> >
> > On 1/18/08, Jose Renteria (Cont, ARL/CISD) <jrenteria at arl.army.mil>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Is this also true for Xdmf files, I am seeing similar behavior?
> > >
> > > Berk Geveci wrote:
> > > >> If I load ParaViewData3.2 test data
> > > >> "singleSphereAnimation_source93T0000.vtp" with Paraview 3.2.1 the
> > data
> > > >> is loaded and when I hit the start animation button nothing
> happens.
> > It
> > > >> seems like Paraview 3.2.1 does not recognize/link the other vtp
> files
> > > >> (0-10).  Is this expected behavior for Paraview 3.2.1?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Yes. Because XML-based VTK files support time natively and through
> pvd
> > > > files, we decided to no longer support file series of XML-based
> VTK
> > > > files. File series work for legacy VTK files as well as some other
> > > > formats that have no time support. If you have a series of vtp
> files,
> > > > you need to write a pvd file that points to them with the
> appropriate
> > > > time values to load them as a series.
> > > >
> > > > -berk
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 1/18/08, Jose Renteria (Cont, ARL/CISD)
> <jrenteria at arl.army.mil>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I build ParaView 3.2.1 on my redhat4 64 linux machine and it
> looks
> > like
> > > >> the animation or the way data is loaded is no longer working or
> has
> > > >> changed since Paraview 2.x.
> > > >>
> > > >> If I load ParaViewData3.2 test data
> > > >> "singleSphereAnimation_source93T0000.vtp" with Paraview 2.x the
> data
> > is
> > > >> loaded and when I hit the start animation button Paraview loops
> > through
> > > >> each of the vtp files (0-10).
> > > >>
> > > >> If I load ParaViewData3.2 test data
> > > >> "singleSphereAnimation_source93T0000.vtp" with Paraview 3.2.1 the
> > data
> > > >> is loaded and when I hit the start animation button nothing
> happens.
> > It
> > > >> seems like Paraview 3.2.1 does not recognize/link the other vtp
> files
> > > >> (0-10).  Is this expected behavior for Paraview 3.2.1?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> ParaView mailing list
> > > >> ParaView at paraview.org
> > > >> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ParaView mailing list
> > ParaView at paraview.org
> > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
>


More information about the ParaView mailing list