[Paraview] Can These Options Be Combined in 3.2.1?
Moreland, Kenneth
kmorel at sandia.gov
Tue Feb 12 11:27:41 EST 2008
You may be happier by upgrading your MPI to something that supports MPI I/O. Parallel IO can make a big difference.
-Ken
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kent Eschenberg [mailto:eschenbe at psc.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 9:26 AM
> To: Moreland, Kenneth
> Cc: ParaView
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] Can These Options Be Combined in 3.2.1?
>
> Thanks! Removing the request for parallel HDF allowed it to work.
> Kent
>
> Moreland, Kenneth wrote:
> > The first three definitely work together. I haven't done anything with
> parallel HDF myself, but I can think of no reason why it should not work.
> >
> > MPI_MODE_RDWR is part of MPI 2. Perhaps your implementation of MPI
> does not
> fully support all of the MPI 2 extensions (in particular the MPI I/O
> functions
> and definitions).
> >
> > -Ken
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: paraview-bounces+kmorel=sandia.gov at paraview.org
> [mailto:paraview-
> >> bounces+kmorel=sandia.gov at paraview.org] On Behalf Of Kent Eschenberg
> >> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 10:16 AM
> >> To: ParaView
> >> Subject: [Paraview] Can These Options Be Combined in 3.2.1?
> >>
> >> Can these options coexist in ParaView 3.2.1?
> >>
> >> - MPI
> >> - Python wrapping (to get pvbatch)
> >> - shared libraries (required for Python)
> >> - parallel HDF (seems like a good idea)
> >>
> >> On a 64-bit CentOS system "make" fails with this:
> >>
> >> [ 24%] Building C object
> Utilities/hdf5/CMakeFiles/vtkhdf5.dir/H5FDmpio.o
> >> /usr/local/packages/paraview/3.2.1/src/Utilities/hdf5/H5FDmpio.c: In
> >> function
> >> 'H5FD_mpio_open':
> >> /usr/local/packages/paraview/3.2.1/src/Utilities/hdf5/H5FDmpio.c:772:
> >> error:
> >> 'MPI_MODE_RDWR' undeclared (first use in this function)
> >>
> >> plus a few more similar ones.
> >>
> >> TIA!
> >> Kent
> >> Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center
More information about the ParaView
mailing list