[Paraview] Can These Options Be Combined in 3.2.1?

Kent Eschenberg eschenbe at psc.edu
Tue Feb 12 11:26:02 EST 2008


Thanks! Removing the request for parallel HDF allowed it to work.
Kent

Moreland, Kenneth wrote:
 > The first three definitely work together.  I haven't done anything with 
parallel HDF myself, but I can think of no reason why it should not work.
 >
 > MPI_MODE_RDWR is part of MPI 2.  Perhaps your implementation of MPI does not 
fully support all of the MPI 2 extensions (in particular the MPI I/O functions 
and definitions).
 >
 > -Ken
 >
 >> -----Original Message-----
 >> From: paraview-bounces+kmorel=sandia.gov at paraview.org [mailto:paraview-
 >> bounces+kmorel=sandia.gov at paraview.org] On Behalf Of Kent Eschenberg
 >> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 10:16 AM
 >> To: ParaView
 >> Subject: [Paraview] Can These Options Be Combined in 3.2.1?
 >>
 >> Can these options coexist in ParaView 3.2.1?
 >>
 >> - MPI
 >> - Python wrapping (to get pvbatch)
 >> - shared libraries (required for Python)
 >> - parallel HDF (seems like a good idea)
 >>
 >> On a 64-bit CentOS system "make" fails with this:
 >>
 >> [ 24%] Building C object Utilities/hdf5/CMakeFiles/vtkhdf5.dir/H5FDmpio.o
 >> /usr/local/packages/paraview/3.2.1/src/Utilities/hdf5/H5FDmpio.c: In
 >> function
 >> 'H5FD_mpio_open':
 >> /usr/local/packages/paraview/3.2.1/src/Utilities/hdf5/H5FDmpio.c:772:
 >> error:
 >> 'MPI_MODE_RDWR' undeclared (first use in this function)
 >>
 >> plus a few more similar ones.
 >>
 >> TIA!
 >> Kent
 >> Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center


More information about the ParaView mailing list