[Paraview] Can These Options Be Combined in 3.2.1?
Kent Eschenberg
eschenbe at psc.edu
Tue Feb 12 11:26:02 EST 2008
Thanks! Removing the request for parallel HDF allowed it to work.
Kent
Moreland, Kenneth wrote:
> The first three definitely work together. I haven't done anything with
parallel HDF myself, but I can think of no reason why it should not work.
>
> MPI_MODE_RDWR is part of MPI 2. Perhaps your implementation of MPI does not
fully support all of the MPI 2 extensions (in particular the MPI I/O functions
and definitions).
>
> -Ken
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: paraview-bounces+kmorel=sandia.gov at paraview.org [mailto:paraview-
>> bounces+kmorel=sandia.gov at paraview.org] On Behalf Of Kent Eschenberg
>> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 10:16 AM
>> To: ParaView
>> Subject: [Paraview] Can These Options Be Combined in 3.2.1?
>>
>> Can these options coexist in ParaView 3.2.1?
>>
>> - MPI
>> - Python wrapping (to get pvbatch)
>> - shared libraries (required for Python)
>> - parallel HDF (seems like a good idea)
>>
>> On a 64-bit CentOS system "make" fails with this:
>>
>> [ 24%] Building C object Utilities/hdf5/CMakeFiles/vtkhdf5.dir/H5FDmpio.o
>> /usr/local/packages/paraview/3.2.1/src/Utilities/hdf5/H5FDmpio.c: In
>> function
>> 'H5FD_mpio_open':
>> /usr/local/packages/paraview/3.2.1/src/Utilities/hdf5/H5FDmpio.c:772:
>> error:
>> 'MPI_MODE_RDWR' undeclared (first use in this function)
>>
>> plus a few more similar ones.
>>
>> TIA!
>> Kent
>> Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center
More information about the ParaView
mailing list