[Paraview] Simple problem with Paraview 3.1.0
Moreland, Kenneth
kmorel at sandia.gov
Tue Sep 25 11:45:20 EDT 2007
I tried this data set on the two versions of ParaView that I have
available on my Windows XP: ParaView 3.0.2 and the latest CVS snapshot
(of last night). The behavior looks fine in both places to me.
Perhaps this was a temporary problem that happened in the 3.1.0 snapshot
(which is not an official release of ParaView and is known to be buggy).
Could you try with ParaView 3.0.2 to see if that fixes the problem?
Trying a more recent CVS snapshot would be good to if you are
comfortable with checking out and compiling ParaView yourself.
-Ken
________________________________
From: paraview-bounces+kmorel=sandia.gov at paraview.org
[mailto:paraview-bounces+kmorel=sandia.gov at paraview.org] On Behalf Of
Hom Nath Gharti
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 6:25 AM
To: paraview at paraview.org
Subject: [Paraview] Simple problem with Paraview 3.1.0
This problem is simple but interesting one.
I am plotting some scalar data over structured grids. The data file is
as follow:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<VTKFile type="StructuredGrid" version="0.1" byte_order="LittleEndian"
compressor="vtkZLibDataCompressor">
<StructuredGrid WholeExtent="0 1 0 2 0 3">
<Piece Extent="0 1 0 2 0 3">
<PointData>
<DataArray type="Int16" Name="Fat ray (s)" format="ascii"
RangeMin="0" RangeMax="6">
0 1 1 2 2 3
1 2 2 3 3 4
2 3 3 4 4 5
3 4 4 5 5 6
</DataArray>
<DataArray type="Int16" Name="Fat rays (s)" format="ascii"
RangeMin="0" RangeMax="6">
0 1 1 2 2 3
1 2 2 3 3 4
2 3 3 4 4 5
3 4 4 5 5 6
</DataArray>
</PointData>
<CellData>
</CellData>
<Points>
<DataArray type="Float32" Name="Array 0x85412e8"
NumberOfComponents="3" format="ascii" RangeMin="0"
RangeMax="3.7416573868">
0 0 0 1 0 0
0 1 0 1 1 0
0 2 0 1 2 0
0 0 1 1 0 1
0 1 1 1 1 1
0 2 1 1 2 1
0 0 2 1 0 2
0 1 2 1 1 2
0 2 2 1 2 2
0 0 3 1 0 3
0 1 3 1 1 3
0 2 3 1 2 3
</DataArray>
</Points>
</Piece>
</StructuredGrid>
</VTKFile>
In first PointData set I have used Name="Fat ray (s)" and Name="Fat rays
(s)" in second case. When I tried to plot surface of these data pair
separately, to my surprise, I get the constant value(it does not work
even with rescale to data range) to in first case while in second case
it shows the righ result. Data are the same in two cases. I tried with
several other data, but found the similar problem. Is it something the
problem in my operating system or the problem with some key words
conflict in paraview 3.1.0? I would be grateful for the suggestions.
Sincerely,
Hom Nath
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20070925/7cc655ef/attachment.html
More information about the ParaView
mailing list