Antw: [Paraview] Use paraview with a SGI prism and a Cave
yi mu
mugjfyi at yahoo.com
Fri Nov 3 17:24:52 EST 2006
Hi,
I have tried your approach, but it didn't work :(.
After I have tried long enough, I decided the cave
rander module is not going to work, it treats cave as
tiled display, if you look at your configure file, all
the walls have the same z value, if you change the z
value to a different value of a specific wall, that
wall will not work.
For example, I have three walls,
one for the center, one right wing and one floor.
if specify the coordinates like the following:
Environment="DISPLAY=:0.0"
LowerLeft="-1.0 0 -1.0"
LowerRight="0 0 -1.0"
UpperLeft="-1.0 1.0 -1.0" /> //center
<Machine Name="prism_d3"
Environment="DISPLAY=:0.2"
LowerLeft="0 0 -1 "
LowerRight="1 0 -1 "
UpperLeft="0 1 -1" /> //right wing
<Machine Name="prism_d4"
Environment="DISPLAY=:0.3"
LowerLeft="-1 -1 -1 "
LowerRight="0 -1 -1 "
UpperLeft="-1 0 -1" /> //floor
you will see the left upper part of the geometry on
the center wall, right upper part on the right wing
and left bottom part on the floor. But we want the
floor have the whole bottom part, we can have the
whole bottom part by specifying the coordinates
differently, but the bottom part will not align with
the upper part.
If you have any new findings, pleas let me know.
Thanks,
Yi
--- Christian Wohlschlager
<Christian.Wohlschlager at jku.at> wrote:
> ** Reply Requested When Convenient **
>
> Hi !
>
> I didnt try this before , ( i will soon) but i
> recommend try
> LowerRright (front) = Upperright(floor)
> LowerLeft (floor) =
> 0,0, 0 (front =
> 0,0,-1) (z should be 0 in front )
> LowerRight (floor) = 1
> ,0,0
>
> i m not shore but this should it , just give in the
> coordinates from a
> cube.
> tell me your results :-)
>
> christian
>
> >>> yi mu <mugjfyi at yahoo.com> 11/02/06 11:30 PM >>>
> Hi Christian
>
> Thank you very much for your documentation, I was
> able
> to run cave module. I have a cube display with four
> walls, including floor. I am now using three of
> them:
> two walls and a floor, the geometry displays on the
> wall ok but not on the floor, do you have any idea
> how
> to specify the coordinates for the floor?
>
> Here is the coordinates for the two walls:
>
> <Machine Name="prism_d2"
> Environment="DISPLAY=:0.0"
> LowerLeft="- 1.0 0 - 1.0"
> LowerRight="0 0 - 1.0"
> UpperLeft="- 1.0 1.0 - 1.0" />
>
> <Machine Name="prism_d3"
> Environment="DISPLAY=:0.2"
> LowerLeft="0 0 - 1 "
> LowerRight="1 0 - 1 "
> UpperLeft="0 1 - 1" />
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Yi
>
> --- Christian Wohlschlager
> <Christian.Wohlschlager at jku.at> wrote:
>
> > ** Reply Requested When Convenient **
> >
> > Hi Yi !
> >
> > In fact i use 2.5 because i can read in .cube
> > gaussian files for 2.4
> > there is an error but the cave module ??? (should
> > run also)
> > The problem is if you have a cave with 3 walls you
> > need 3 processors
> > for 4 4 processors ...
> > i can run the pvserver with the cave display and
> mpi
> > and on the client
> > in our case (maybe also in yours) the same.
> >
> > so run :
> > on prism:
> > >mpirun - np 3 .\pvserver cave.pvx
> > also on prism another screen or session
> > > ./pvclient -- stereo
> >
> > you can see the client is connected to the server
> > and the Client gui is
> > opend on the display of pvclient is set.
> >
> > the actual cave display is set in the cave.pvx
> >
> > Be carefull in defining cave.pvx during my
> struggle
> > with paraview on
> > the cave i found out the this is more or less on
> of
> > the keys in getting
> > a good cave visualisation.
> >
> > You can send me your cave.pvx (what ever you named
> > it) and your
> > configuration and i can give my hints.
> >
> > i be happy to help you
> >
> > christian
> >
> >
> >
> > >>> yi mu <mugjfyi at yahoo.com> 10/30/06 11:55 >>>
> > Hi, Christian,
> >
> > We have the same configuration as yours, so I am
> > very
> > interested in trying the cave rendering mode out.
> > From
> > your document, step 2, it says Paraview 2.5 (from
> > cvs)
> > with MPI enabled and Paraview 2.5 not MPI enabled,
> > do
> > you mean the server will run with mpi enable and
> > the
> > client with mpi not enabled? which means pvserver
> > will
> > be compiled with MPI enabled and pvclient will be
> > compiled without MPI enabled?
> >
> >
> > Do we really need paraview2.5, how about lower
> > stable
> > version, like paraview2.4?
> >
> > Thank you in advance for your help and I really
> > appreciate your efforts in investigating paraview
> > cave
> > render mode.
> >
> >
> >
> > Yi
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Everyone is raving about the all- new Yahoo! Mail
> > (http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ParaView mailing list
> > ParaView at paraview.org
> > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
> >
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Everyone is raving about the all- new Yahoo! Mail
> (http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/)
>
> _______________________________________________
> ParaView mailing list
> ParaView at paraview.org
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Check out the New Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.
(http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta)
More information about the ParaView
mailing list