[Paraview] Segmentation fault on ParaView 2.4.3

[Berk Geveci]

If it is too big, don't worry about it. I'll approve it and it'll go
through.

On 5/25/06, Kevin H. Hobbs <hobbsk at ohiou.edu> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 10:41 -0700, Tuhin Ghosh wrote:
> > Kevin,
> >
> > I hadn't tried make test, when I run make test all the ParaView
> > related tests fail. So there is something wrong with the build.
> > I built a release version with GNU compilers, is there something in
> > particular that I need to look out for?
> >
> > There is no problem with other X applications.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Tuhin
>
> Berk Geveci is right you should post the CMakeCache.txt. If it's too big
> it might bounce off the list, and you'll have to post it to a web page.
> In any case, try to describe the changes you made in CMake.
>
> It might be useful to start with a clean build directory, and make no
> changes in CMake and try the tests. Then restart and make one change,
> then two... Until you find out when it works, and when it doesn't.
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQBEdfVGqBtEuW+gRPERAlR4AJ9IUcW1ybT9MqV9Zw0yWxhP+B5l1wCfRWz8
> qR+ApJkbAg82rOqXkkIk4uM=
> =FWDf
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ParaView mailing list
> ParaView at paraview.org
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20060525/fb8c2cc0/attachment.htm