[Paraview] ParaView 2.4 on Mac OS 10.4, PowerPC
Mike Jackson
imikejackson at gmail.com
Sat Jul 8 15:33:34 EDT 2006
OK.. I apologize to Kitware for my outbursts but there is a subtle
error when you follow the directions on the wiki: (http://
www.paraview.org/Wiki/
ParaView:FAQ#How_do_I_compile_ParaView_for_Mac_OS_X.3F)
From the wiki it says:
"Also make sure that OPENGL_INCLUDE_DIR is set to a directory that
contains GL/gl.h, and set OPENGL_gl_LIBRARY and OPENGL_glu_LIBRARY
accordingly."
Well, when you run ccmake on the paraview source the opengl libs and
includes are _still_ pointing to a directory that has gl.h and glu.h
except that directory is the OpenGL Frameworks. To build this
properly you really should be pointing the OpenGL entries in the
ccmake to /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.dylib and /usr/X11R6/lib/libGLU.dylib.
The includes seem to be picked up correctly in /usr/X11R6/include.
The other bit about "CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS and
CMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS to "-Wl,-search_paths_first" is new to me.
No has ever suggested that to me until the email below from Rick
Wagner (Rick I owe you something.. ). So all the ranting and raving I
did and no one from Kitware said, hey this really does work and all
you have to do is ..... All I got was the standard "we don't
support OS X".
Now what would be _nice_ is if the standard CMakeLists.txt that comes
with Paraview had a nice "IF DARWIN SET EXE_LINKER_FLAGS... " and
"Set OPENGL_LIBS " _already_ set so that Paraview would just compile
straight out of the box. It would go a long way to having new folks
who give Paraview a try on OS X have a much easier time.
Sorry for my immature attitude lately.. but it is a bit frustrating
when your Primary Vis app stops working and you get no joy from the
Developer.
Now.. on to remove that BootCamp Partition and figure out what
my .vti files will not load.
--------
Mike Jackson
imikejackson <at> gmail <dot> com
On Jul 7, 2006, at 12:34 AM, Rick Wagner wrote:
>
> On Jul 6, 2006, at 7:46 PM, Mike Jackson wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 6, 2006, at 10:33 PM, Randy Hudson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Mike,
>>>
>>> I have built paraview 2.4.3 on my Intel Mac (just so the record's
>>> complete), and it does not seg fault. (Or, it might've the first
>>> time I ran it, but it has worked fine since.)
>>>
>>> But, if I'm the only one in the galaxy who's been able to do
>>> that, your claim that it's a non-starter is still true.
>>>
>>>
>>> Mike Jackson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Um.. actually it is the other way around. Paraview is a non-
>>>> starter on Intel Macs. It compiles and then segfaults.
>>>>
>>>> --------
>>>> Mike Jackson
>>>> imikejackson <at> gmail <dot> com
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> Randy.
>>
>>
>> Either send me your CMakeCache file or send me the binaries... If
>> they work I will offer a public apology.. until then I stand by
>> what I have found.
>>
>> Also, what hardware are you running? I am running OS X 10.4.6/7
>> on a MacBook PRO.
>>
>> --------
>> Mike Jackson
>> imikejackson <at> gmail <dot> com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ParaView mailing list
>> ParaView at paraview.org
>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Try this CMakeCache.txt, it's the result of some advice I received
> when I was try to build ParaView. The post must of been off of the
> mailing list. Hopefully I remembered to thank Ivan. (His message is
> at the bottom of this one.)
>
> --Rick
>
> <CMakeCache.txt>
>
> Some info on my PowerBook.
>
> Hardware Overview:
>
> Machine Name: PowerBook G4 15"
> Machine Model: PowerBook5,8
> CPU Type: PowerPC G4 (1.5)
> Number Of CPUs: 1
> CPU Speed: 1.67 GHz
> L2 Cache (per CPU): 512 KB
> Memory: 1 GB
> Bus Speed: 167 MHz
> Boot ROM Version: 4.9.6f0
> Serial Number: W86051UKSWZ
> Sudden Motion Sensor:
> State: Enabled
>
> System Software Overview:
>
> System Version: Mac OS X 10.4.6 (8I127)
> Kernel Version: Darwin 8.6.0
> Boot Volume: Macintosh HD
> Computer Name: cable
> User Name: Rick Wagner (rpwagner)
>
>
> /********** original message from Ivan *************/
>
>
> From: guajanai at student.ethz.ch
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] ParaView 2.4.3 and OS X 10.4.6 - Build
> Problems
> Date: April 27, 2006 2:56:22 AM PDT
> To: guardian72 at guardian72.com
>
> Hi Rick,
> I used to have similar problems as I tried to compile ParaView form
> my MacBook. The solution was to set both CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS
> and CMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS to
> -Wl,-serch_paths_first .
> By default paraview was linked against the wrong ones. Here's a
> quote from my own thread in this mailing list as I had the
> compiling problems:
>
>
>> Success! Everything seems to work fine now (although I use
>> just a very small subset of paraview's capabilities).
>>
>> I had to to the following, in case someone faces the same problems:
>>
>> - disable VTK_USE_CARBON, VTK_USE_COCOA and enable VTK_USE_USE_X
>> (see this FAQ entry:
>> http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/
>> ParaView:FAQ#How_do_I_compile_ParaView_for_Mac_OS_X.3F)
>>
>> - make sure that cmake is using the OpenGL implementation found
>> in /usr/X11R6/lib
>> (both libGL and libGLU) and the headers in /usr/X11R6/include/
>>
>> - set ALL the CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS* and
>> CMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS* (just
>> to be sure) to -Wl,-search_paths_first
>>
>> - run make
>>
>> I'd like to thank Kenneth Moreland for his invaluable help with
>> this issue!
>>
>> Ivan Guajana
>>
>
> I hope this helps,,
>
> Ivan
>
>
> On 20/apr/06, at 23:23, Rick Wagner wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just built ParaView 2.4.3 on my G4 PowerBook running OS X
>> 10.4.6, using the instructions from the wiki: BUILD_SHARED_LIBS
>> ON; VTK_USE_CARBON_OFF; VTK_USE_X ON. I used gcc4.0 and CMake 2.2.3.
>>
>> The build chugs along and finishes, but when I try to run the
>> paraview executable, I get a segmentation fault. This also happens
>> if I try to run pvclient and connect to pvserver. The server
>> process starts up, but when paraview or pvclient display "Creating
>> UI (main view)...", they crash. I've tried running from both the
>> build directory and doing an install.
>>
>> This seems similar to other postings I've seen, does anyone have a
>> suggestion as to how I should go about debugging this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rick
>> _______________________________________________
>> ParaView mailing list
>> ParaView at paraview.org
>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
>
>
More information about the ParaView
mailing list