[Paraview] PV 2.0.3 versus Suse Linux 9.3
SamuelKey
samuelkey at comcast.net
Sun Jul 10 16:13:42 EDT 2005
There appears to be a naming conflict between
ParaView (2.0.3) and Xorg's X-window server
in Suse Linux 9.3
>From a ParaView "failed" startup I get --
Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
Aborted
>From the /etc/X11/xorg.conf file I have --
Section "Module"
Load "dbe"
Load "type1"
Load "freetype"
Load "extmod"
Load "glx"
Load "v4l"
EndSection
Both files are attached. My guess at
what may be the trouble is that ParaView
is looking for GLX as the extension name,
and Xorg is using glx as the extension
name???
Any suggestions on what I should do?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Samuel W. Key.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 677 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20050710/afa2684f/SamuelW.Key.vcf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xorg.conf
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6320 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20050710/afa2684f/xorg.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ParaView.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 115 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20050710/afa2684f/ParaView.obj
More information about the ParaView
mailing list