[Paraview] Geophysical XYZ data - which format is best?
S. N. Warren
s_n_warren at hotmail.com
Wed, 19 May 2004 10:21:38 -0300
Good day.
I just got myself a copy of ParaView for the purpose of plotting geophysical
data exported from the commercial software RES3DINV. Here is the format
(.xyz):
/Name of survey line is Conversion of RES2DINV data files
/Number of blocks is 384
/Results for iteration 7
/The x, y and z coordinates the centres of the model blocks, and
/the resistivity, conductivity and IP value of each block is given below.
/The I.P. is given in terms of Chargeability with units in mV/V
/ X Y Elevation Resistivity Conductivity
I.P. Sensitivity
137.439 649.996 99.450 80306.586 0.00001245
21.018 7.4934e-001
162.377 649.998 100.875 15099.280 0.00006623
9.732 1.9640e+000
187.142 649.996 98.675 68860.805 0.00001452
7.808 5.4303e-001
211.869 649.997 95.275 46299.848 0.00002160
6.606 1.4108e+000
The output that I am looking for is a couple of 3D plots (the conductivity
plotted at the x,y,z locations and the resistivity plotted at the x,y,z
locations). The "ground" surface (in the x-y plane) will be irregular as it
represents the topography. I would like to be able to contour the data
cubes.
My question is: What is the most appropriate data format to use for data
like this? I figure probably VTK format or PLOT3D format. The PLOT3D format
looks a little bit more complicated than what I need - probably would be
counter-productive to convert my data to that... But, honestly, I'm totally
unsure. Has anyone else worked with a simple xyz data set like this? What
should I use?
Any advice would help so much!
Thanks,
Steve
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN Premium
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines