[Paraview-developers] Using TIME_LABEL_ANNOTATION

Sebastien Jourdain sebastien.jourdain at kitware.com
Tue Feb 12 16:05:42 EST 2013


Are you sure you are providing the time label at the right time.
(information request) ?
Does your field value is valid at that time of request ?

Don't have much idea of what could be the issue here.

Seb


On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Reuter, Michael A. <reuterma at ornl.gov>wrote:

> Yes, my reader is the only source and the label does not update.
>
> M
>
> From: Sebastien Jourdain <sebastien.jourdain at kitware.com<mailto:
> sebastien.jourdain at kitware.com>>
> Date: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:34 PM
> To: Michael Reuter <reuterma at ornl.gov<mailto:reuterma at ornl.gov>>
> Cc: "paraview-developers at paraview.org<mailto:
> paraview-developers at paraview.org>" <paraview-developers at paraview.org
> <mailto:paraview-developers at paraview.org>>
> Subject: Re: [Paraview-developers] Using TIME_LABEL_ANNOTATION
>
> Have you got only your reader in the pipeline browser ?
> Because if several reader report different time annotation then only
> "Time" will win in the global UI while based on the selection the
> information panel will report the current value for the selected
> filter/source.
>
> Seb
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Reuter, Michael A. <reuterma at ornl.gov
> <mailto:reuterma at ornl.gov>> wrote:
> Hi Seb,
>
> Yes, the ShearedSource plugin works as expected. My reader only has one
> time source, so I don't think there can be a problem with a label mismatch.
>
> Cheers,
> M
>
> From: Sebastien Jourdain <sebastien.jourdain at kitware.com<mailto:
> sebastien.jourdain at kitware.com><mailto:sebastien.jourdain at kitware.com
> <mailto:sebastien.jourdain at kitware.com>>>
> Date: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 11:24 AM
> To: Michael Reuter <reuterma at ornl.gov<mailto:reuterma at ornl.gov><mailto:
> reuterma at ornl.gov<mailto:reuterma at ornl.gov>>>
> Cc: "paraview-developers at paraview.org<mailto:
> paraview-developers at paraview.org><mailto:paraview-developers at paraview.org
> <mailto:paraview-developers at paraview.org>>" <
> paraview-developers at paraview.org<mailto:paraview-developers at paraview.org
> ><mailto:paraview-developers at paraview.org<mailto:
> paraview-developers at paraview.org>>>
> Subject: Re: [Paraview-developers] Using TIME_LABEL_ANNOTATION
>
> This looks like a bug. Unless you have another time source that does not
> provide the same name for the annotation.
>
> Seb
>
> PS: Does it work with the vtkShearedCubeSource.cxx ?
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Michael Reuter <reuterma at ornl.gov
> <mailto:reuterma at ornl.gov><mailto:reuterma at ornl.gov<mailto:
> reuterma at ornl.gov>>> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use the
> vtkStreamingDemandDrivenPipeline::TIME_LABEL_ANNOTATION() property in my
> reader plugin via ParaView 3.98.0 using the vtkShearedCubeSource.cxx as the
> example. I'm getting a good string to the property and the Information tab
> in the properties panel shows the new label name I provided. However, the
> pqAnimationTimeToolbar widget in the GUI is not showing the new label. The
> example ShearedCube source plugin implies that the new label should be
> shown there. I tried to make sure it wasn't my plugin so I added
> vtkStreamingDemandDrivenPipeline::TIME_LABEL_ANNOTATION() calls to the
> vtkExodusIIReader.cxx before the
> vtkStreamingDemandDrivenPipeline::TIME_STEPS() calls. Using the can.ex2
> file, I see that the information tab has the new label I provided but the
> pqAnimationTimeToolbar widget doesn't change. Is this a bug or am I missing
> an extra step that would allow my plugin change the GUI widget like the
> ShearedCube source does?
>
> Thanks,
> M
>
> Dr. Michael Reuter
> Data Analysis and Visualization Group
> Neutron Data Analysis and Visualization Division
> Oak Ridge National Laboratory
>
> Office: 1-865-241-7216<tel:1-865-241-7216><tel:1-865-241-7216<tel:
> 1-865-241-7216>>
> Fax: 1-865-574-6080<tel:1-865-574-6080><tel:1-865-574-6080<tel:
> 1-865-574-6080>>
> Email: reuterma at ornl.gov<mailto:reuterma at ornl.gov><mailto:
> reuterma at ornl.gov<mailto:reuterma at ornl.gov>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paraview-developers mailing list
> Paraview-developers at paraview.org<mailto:Paraview-developers at paraview.org
> ><mailto:Paraview-developers at paraview.org<mailto:
> Paraview-developers at paraview.org>>
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview-developers/attachments/20130212/871462af/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Paraview-developers mailing list