[Paraview-developers] Plans for changes to ServerManger (Paraview 4.0 or later)

[Yumin Yuan]

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
<utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
>
>>the new class, vtkPMProxy, if I read
>> the design correctly, is on the server, then should its name have
>> "Proxy" at all?
>
> Very good point. We were calling it vtkPMProxy since it was a PMObject
> subclass corresponding to a vtkSMProxy. Any suggestions for names are
> welcome.

how about vtkPMObjectWrapper?


>
>> Also, if vtkPMProxy needs the
>> vtkSMProxyDefinitionManager to figure what vtkObject to create, does
>> this mean vtkSMProxyDefinitionManager will also be located on server?
>
> Yes, the definitions will now be located on the server. Infact, when a
> client connects to a server, it will sync its local definitions with
> the server, thus ensuring that they match up.
>

then you may want a different name for it, such as
vtkPVProxyDefinitionManager ?

Yumin