[Paraview-developers] Moving to hdf5-1.8.x
Moreland, Kenneth
kmorel at sandia.gov
Thu Apr 15 14:14:45 EDT 2010
I am confused about why take out HDF5 now that it is converted to CMake. That should make it easer to cram it into ParaView.
As Utkarsh mentioned, having HDF5 included in the source simplifies things for anyone building ParaView. If John spends 120 minutes updating HDF5 in ParaView and I and everyone else spends 0 minutes setting it up to build, that sounds like a good deal to me :-)
-Ken
On 4/15/10 8:05 AM, "Utkarsh Ayachit" <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
> Why was it included inside PV in the first place. I don't really believe it needs to be there.
One of the reasons why it was included in the first place, I believe,
is to make it easier for developers/users. Once you download the
ParaView source, you have everything (almost) that you need to build
it.
As Dave suggested, external_project might be a good alternative. Or
just making it a git sub-project.
Utkarsh
_______________________________________________
Paraview-developers mailing list
Paraview-developers at paraview.org
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers
**** Kenneth Moreland
*** Sandia National Laboratories
***********
*** *** *** email: kmorel at sandia.gov
** *** ** phone: (505) 844-8919
*** web: http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview-developers/attachments/20100415/5528a7fc/attachment.htm>
More information about the Paraview-developers
mailing list