[Insight-users] simple registration & deformation field question
Tim Bhatnagar
tim.bhatnagar at gmail.com
Tue Nov 6 13:28:09 EST 2012
Hello all,
I know this is very basic, but confirmation of my suspicion would be
appreciated:
Using the ITK standard 'fixed image', 'moving image' templating that is
present in all of the ITK examples, if I have a deformation field printing
out from the registration process (the field is written again in the same
fashion as in the ITK examples), it *SHOULD* be the field that when applied
to the 'moving image', should result in the 'fixed image', correct?
I'm viewing my deformation field in Paraview and it is opposite to what I
was expecting. Additionally, the standard 'output image' written from the
registration also shows a great transformed image (what I'm after).
Am I writing/reading an inverse of the deformation field for some reason?
If it helps, I am using DeformableRegistration2.cxx with some modified
histogram parameters.
Thanks,
--
Tim Bhatnagar
PhD Candidate
Orthopaedic Injury Biomechanics Group
Department of Mechanical Engineering
University of British Columbia
Rm 5000 - 818 West 10th Ave.
Vancouver, BC
Canada
V5Z 1M9
Ph: (604) 675-8845
Fax: (604) 675-8820
Web: oibg.mech.ubc.ca
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20121106/7f521c54/attachment.htm>
More information about the Insight-users
mailing list