[Insight-users] some questions about Demons filter
Torsten Rohlfing
torsten at synapse.sri.com
Wed Nov 2 13:07:43 EST 2005
Hi Borja --
I did some experiments recently where I compared the performance of the
Demons filter to that of the Curvature PDE filter and my own private
implementation (not in ITK) of Rueckert's B-spline algorithm. The
experiment used data from the Internat Brain Segmentation Repository
(IBSR) to quantify overlap of anatomical structures in MR brain images
after nonrigid inter-subject registration. Basically, say you have MR
image I1 and corresponding segmentation S1, and likewise image I2 and
segmentation S2. Then use a registration algorithm to compute the
transformation from I1 to I2. Then you can pull back the segmentation S2
onto I1, where you can compare the pulled-back segmentation with the
(supposedly) correct one S1.
When I did this and computed the recognition rates (i.e., the number of
correctly labeled pixels), this is what I got:
B-spline: 0.96759
Demons: 0.96689
Curvature: 0.96471
You see that the differences seem marginal, but for what it's worth,
Demons seem to work slightly better than the Curvature registration
algorithm, and slightly worse than my version of "The Rueckert."
As for the parameters: I ran Demons and Curvature in a four-level
multi-resolution scheme using ITK's multi-resolution registration
framework. The Rueckert algorithm as run with an initial 40 mm control
point grid that was refined 4 times by a factor of 2, down to 2.5 mm
final spacing.
TR
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: torsten.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 366 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20051102/40f7ca38/torsten.vcf
More information about the Insight-users
mailing list