[Insight-users] Re: Pelizzari's Head and Hat surface fit registration

[Luis Ibanez]

Hi Raghu,

If you plan to develop ITK code to be contributed later on,
it will be a good idea to setup an Experimental build in
your machine and to submit occasionally to the Dashboard.

This is very easy to do, just rerun CMake, enable TESTING,
and then, from your build directory you can do

             ctest -D Experimental

that should trigger the build, run the tests, gather the
output and submit it to the Dashboard server.

Once you have an experimental build in place you can
continuously double check that your code in development
is compatible with the CVS version of ITK.

You should also look at the document on the ITK coding
Style in the document

    Insight/Documentation/
               InsightDeveloperStart.pdf

http://www.itk.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/Documentation/InsightDeveloperStart.pdf?rev=1.4&root=Insight&view=log


    Please let us know if you have any questions



    Regards,


       Luis


-------------------
Raghu Venkatram wrote:

> Hi Luis,
> I
> Chalrles Pelizzari has some C code on his website, at the U. of
> Chicago. My goal is to ITKise it.  I would be glad to hear about the
> developmental process with regard to ITK.
> 
> Thanks,
> Raghu
> 
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:31:35 -0400, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com> wrote:
> 
>>Hi Raghu,
>>
>>As far as I know, nobody is working in an implementation
>>of the Pelizzari's surface registration algorithm.
>>
>>Please let us know if you need any assistance on the
>>process of implementing this method.
>>
>>   Thanks,
>>
>>      Luis
>>
>>-----------------------
>>
>>
>>Raghu Venkatram wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi Luis,
>>>
>>>I was wondering if anybody had started implementing the Head and Hat
>>>registration algorithm.
>>>I found some work done initially at the University of Chocago.
>>>
>>>http://rover.bsd.uchicago.edu/chuck/imagcorr/
>>>
>>>I believe it can easily be ported and implemented using ITK.  I would
>>>like to know if there were people working on it, if not I would start
>>>putting it together based on ITK.
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Raghu
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
>