[ITK-dev] Problems with Change in itkStaticConstMacro

[Matthew McCormick (thewtex)]

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Bradly Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
> It’s certainly would be great if I could rely on using gcc 4.8+ for building
> the distributions for SimpleITK. But my understanding for several situations
> 4.1 is still essentially required.

What are the situations?  GCC 4.1 is not required by PEP 513.


> Your blog post solution for static linking in un-accetable as I don’t want
> to use a GPL license. Along with static linking not being recommended with
> PEP 513, and lastly it can cause conflicts when used in a loaded module with
> an older libc version.

My blog post does not say static linking is required or the GPL is required.


> PEP 513 clearly says:
>
> GCC <= 4.2.0

This excludes GCC 4.1.


Matt