[ITK-dev] Missing IO factories when building without cmake

[Matt McCormick]

Please.

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe I can resurrect it and use it until we have a better solution?
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Matt McCormick
> <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>> +1.  Bill's fix was the best one I have seen implemented.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> We need to do something to help the users. There are 42 messages (not
>>> including threads) on the users list. Typically, after a few
>>> responses, we ask "Are you using cmake to configure your project?" Our
>>> suggested solutions are not consistent. My patch provided an
>>> explanation of the most probable cause (not using cmake) and a
>>> solution (register the IO's you need). These questions seem to be from
>>> users that are creating apps, not users of apps that someone has
>>> created.
>>>
>>> Bill
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Matt McCormick
>>> <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Jim Miller <millerjv at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Is there a way at build time whether we could whether an executable does not have any imageio factories linked in?
>>>>
>>>> Nope - the issue is caused by initialization that occurs at runtime.
>>>> The ImageIO classes are linked in.
>>>>
>>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com
>
>
>
> --
> Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com