[ITK-dev] Missing IO factories when building without cmake

[Bill Lorensen]

Maybe I can resurrect it and use it until we have a better solution?

Bill


On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Matt McCormick
<matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
> +1.  Bill's fix was the best one I have seen implemented.
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> We need to do something to help the users. There are 42 messages (not
>> including threads) on the users list. Typically, after a few
>> responses, we ask "Are you using cmake to configure your project?" Our
>> suggested solutions are not consistent. My patch provided an
>> explanation of the most probable cause (not using cmake) and a
>> solution (register the IO's you need). These questions seem to be from
>> users that are creating apps, not users of apps that someone has
>> created.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Matt McCormick
>> <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Jim Miller <millerjv at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Is there a way at build time whether we could whether an executable does not have any imageio factories linked in?
>>>
>>> Nope - the issue is caused by initialization that occurs at runtime.
>>> The ImageIO classes are linked in.
>>>
>>> Matt
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com



-- 
Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com