[Insight-developers] Insight Journal and ITK v4
Tom Vercauteren
tom.vercauteren at m4x.org
Tue Dec 4 19:39:33 EST 2012
Amazing! This was the second IJ submission that I wanted to update but
thought it would be a tougher issue.
Anyway, many thanks Hans. The code did not compile directly with ITK3
so I started a fork:
https://github.com/tompouce25/LogSymmetricDemons
It is basically the original code that gets compiled when using ITK3
and your ported version (with a small cleanup) when using ITK4.
Let me know offline if you want me to issue a pull request.
Tom
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Johnson, Hans J <hans-johnson at uiowa.edu> wrote:
> I think I did this already?
>
> https://github.com/BRAINSia/LogSymmetricDemons
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 4, 2012, at 3:52 PM, "Tom Vercauteren" <tom.vercauteren at m4x.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I unfortunately have almost no time anymore to contribute to ITK. Yet,
> I wanted to start fiddling with ITK 4 (I know it has been out for
> quite some time already...) by cleaning up an old submission of mine
> that needs some TLC to compile seamlessly with ITK 3 and 4:
> http://hdl.handle.net/1926/510
>
> I was happy to see that the code is now on github
> https://github.com/midas-journal/midas-journal-154
> but I could not find anywhere in the Insight Journal documentation
> whether (and how) I could use this repository to update the
> submission.
>
> Then I started without any porting effort to compile my old code with
> ITK 4. I did not want to rely on any ITKv3Support mechanism as I
> didn't want my code not to be native ITK4 in the end (I still have bad
> memories about relying on Qt3Support a few years ago).
>
> I first stumbled into a compilation error in ImageCompare.cxx:
> #error For ITKv4 compatibility, use
> itk::Testing::ComparisonImageFilter instead of
> itk::DifferenceImageFilter
>
> Remembering that ImageCompare was part of the Insight Journal template
> package, I went back and re-downloaded the template package.
> Unfortunately, the template package has not been ported to ITK4 yet
> and the ImageCompare.cxx file is still the same as the old one I had.
>
> I could of course patch my local Insight Journal Template Package as
> well as my other files and when everything will work fine, I could
> also upload a new source package to the Insight Journal rather than
> using github but this doesn't sound quite right. Did I miss something
> or is it simply that the Insight Journal also needs some TLC to
> properly handle ITK4?
>
> That being said, are there any suggestions to handle seamlessly ITK 3
> and 4 without imposition the use of ITKv3Support. I can see two
> options right now:
> 1) Pepper the code with #if ITK_VERSION
> 2) Have two distinct files, one for ITK3, one for ITK4 and let cmake
> choose which one to compile
>
> Sorry for the long email and thanks for all the efforts that have been
> made for ITK4 already.
>
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential
> and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the
> sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it. Thank
> you.
> ________________________________
More information about the Insight-developers
mailing list