[Insight-developers] ITK & WrapITK Install better, still not great.

[Brad King]

On 05/17/2011 04:58 PM, Ashish Sharma wrote:
> 2. ${CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX}/lib/WrapITK-4.0/ . 
> With this  user sets up path per WrapITK version or we could do that as part of the installation
> 
> 4. ${CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX}/lib/ITK-4.0/WrapITK/
> Might be better to put all ITK-4.0 packages inside a single ITK-4.0 directory. We won't require versioned names.
> 
> 5. ${CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX}/lib/ITK-4.0/
> Put all wrapITK libraries here along with libraries of other packages. We won't require versioned names.

Any of these is fine with me.  Versioned names make sense only for
libraries that will be loaded by the static or dynamic linker.  If
your loading scripts know how to dlopen the per-language modules
directly then they can have unversioned names but sit in a versioned
directory.

-Brad