[Insight-developers] CableSwig Decoupling

[Brad King]

On 01/23/2011 09:18 AM, Johnson, Hans J wrote:
> ITK-Developers,
> 
> I'm trying to identify what is needed to build ITK with the new
> wrapping.  Based on Gaetan's comments, 
> "The use of stand-alone swig instead of CableSwig, the tool created to wrap 
>                   ITK. This decreases the developing maintenance, and
> makes the connection
>                   with other tool wrapped with swig easier. Note that
> two tool packaged with 
>                  CableSwig are still needed — gccxml and cableidx —
> that's why you still have to 
>                  install CableSwig package to build WrapITK. ", 
> 
> I was wondering if the current CableSwig package components could be
> de-coupled from one another so that only the necessary parts (gccxml and
> cableidx) are downloaded and compiled.

The gccxml project has always been separate:  http://www.gccxml.org

Gaëtan, why is cableidx still needed?

-Brad