[Insight-developers] SimpleITK ARB Examples

[Gabe Hart]

I think there are two major points that are somewhat independent in this 
last example (Enum approach).  The first is the use of enums for 
parameter setting so that rather than having a gaussian.SetSigma(2.0) 
function, you have a gaussian.SetParameterFloat("Sigma", 2.0).  The 
second is maintaining the granularity of the optimizer, metric, 
transform, and interpolator.  I'll add a note to this effect to the wiki.

-Gabe

On 09/07/2010 10:20 AM, Alexandre GOUAILLARD wrote:
> hi guys,
>
> I also think that pointed out examples help grasp the concept more
> precisly and is a very good idea.
>
> Now, it looks to me that 3 possible implementations are illustrated,
> and I fail to see the difference between the latest one (with the
> finest granularity) and the current implementation using wrapITK. If
> you don't provide a simple (fonctionnal, matlab-like) layer, and
> provide a class granularity, with manual instanciation for a given set
> a types, then, a solution exists, right?
>
> What am I missing?
>
> alex.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Gabe Hart<gabe.hart at kitware.com>  wrote:
>    
>> This looks great.  I think it makes a lot of sense at this phase to focus on
>> end user examples rather than putting too much time into complex sample
>> implementations since there are numerous different design possibilities that
>> could take a lot of time to code up and ultimately end up being discarded.
>>
>> One further thought I have for the collection of examples on the wiki is to
>> include a few notes about each one that highlight the pros and cons of the
>> given approach.  For example, maintaining the pipeline structure will allow
>> for a much easier implementation of streaming which may not be immediately
>> obvious to a potential user scanning the example.
>>
>> Also, it looks like there has been a stand alone page made for the examples
>> at:
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/SimpleITK/Advisory_Review_Board/Prototype_Code_Discussions
>>
>> -Gabe
>>
>> On 09/03/2010 04:07 AM, Dan Mueller wrote:
>>      
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have some other ideas regarding registration. Unfortunately it is
>>> difficult for me to attend t-cons to share these ideas. I have not yet
>>> finished the example implementation, so I have added the expected
>>> end-user example to the wiki page.
>>>
>>>   http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/SimpleITK/Advisory_Review_Board#Enum_approach
>>>
>>> Regards, Dan (Mueller)
>>>
>>> On 2 September 2010 22:55, Gabe Hart<gabe.hart at kitware.com>    wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> First off, sorry to have missed the tcon on Tuesday.  It sounds like some
>>>> important decisions were made, particularly the formation of an advisory
>>>> review board for SimpleITK.  I talked to Luis today who suggested that in
>>>> order to move forward with the ARB, we needed some concrete examples to
>>>> show
>>>> the reviewers for the different possible designs of SimpleITK.  In that
>>>> vein, I set up a section of the Wiki to collect these examples.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/SimpleITK/Advisory_Review_Board
>>>>
>>>> I've added a few examples for the gaussian filter and registration use
>>>> cases.  I think the registration case needs some more examples that
>>>> demonstrate the possible range of flexibility for SimpleITK's
>>>> registration
>>>> framework (adjust the transform type, adjust the optimizer, etc...).
>>>>
>>>> Feel free to add new examples or edit the existing ones.  Hopefully we
>>>> can
>>>> get this to cover the full range of possible user interface paradigms.
>>>>
>>>> -Gabe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>
>>