[Insight-developers] SimpleITK ARB Examples

[Alexandre GOUAILLARD]

hi guys,

I also think that pointed out examples help grasp the concept more
precisly and is a very good idea.

Now, it looks to me that 3 possible implementations are illustrated,
and I fail to see the difference between the latest one (with the
finest granularity) and the current implementation using wrapITK. If
you don't provide a simple (fonctionnal, matlab-like) layer, and
provide a class granularity, with manual instanciation for a given set
a types, then, a solution exists, right?

What am I missing?

alex.


On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Gabe Hart <gabe.hart at kitware.com> wrote:
> This looks great.  I think it makes a lot of sense at this phase to focus on
> end user examples rather than putting too much time into complex sample
> implementations since there are numerous different design possibilities that
> could take a lot of time to code up and ultimately end up being discarded.
>
> One further thought I have for the collection of examples on the wiki is to
> include a few notes about each one that highlight the pros and cons of the
> given approach.  For example, maintaining the pipeline structure will allow
> for a much easier implementation of streaming which may not be immediately
> obvious to a potential user scanning the example.
>
> Also, it looks like there has been a stand alone page made for the examples
> at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/SimpleITK/Advisory_Review_Board/Prototype_Code_Discussions
>
> -Gabe
>
> On 09/03/2010 04:07 AM, Dan Mueller wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have some other ideas regarding registration. Unfortunately it is
>> difficult for me to attend t-cons to share these ideas. I have not yet
>> finished the example implementation, so I have added the expected
>> end-user example to the wiki page.
>>
>>  http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/SimpleITK/Advisory_Review_Board#Enum_approach
>>
>> Regards, Dan (Mueller)
>>
>> On 2 September 2010 22:55, Gabe Hart<gabe.hart at kitware.com>  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> First off, sorry to have missed the tcon on Tuesday.  It sounds like some
>>> important decisions were made, particularly the formation of an advisory
>>> review board for SimpleITK.  I talked to Luis today who suggested that in
>>> order to move forward with the ARB, we needed some concrete examples to
>>> show
>>> the reviewers for the different possible designs of SimpleITK.  In that
>>> vein, I set up a section of the Wiki to collect these examples.
>>>
>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/SimpleITK/Advisory_Review_Board
>>>
>>> I've added a few examples for the gaussian filter and registration use
>>> cases.  I think the registration case needs some more examples that
>>> demonstrate the possible range of flexibility for SimpleITK's
>>> registration
>>> framework (adjust the transform type, adjust the optimizer, etc...).
>>>
>>> Feel free to add new examples or edit the existing ones.  Hopefully we
>>> can
>>> get this to cover the full range of possible user interface paradigms.
>>>
>>> -Gabe
>>>
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>