[Insight-developers] [Insight-users] ITK 3.20 Release : Tagging Today.

[Luis Ibanez]

Bill, Sean,


Looking at the errors,

There seems to be a pattern of NaNs
in basic computations.


We have:

itkVectorConfidenceConnectedImageFilterTest<http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=itkVectorConfidenceConnectedImageFilterTest&date=2010-06-30>


and

itkChiSquareDistributionTest<http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=itkChiSquareDistributionTest&date=2010-06-30>
This one is failing due to NANs:
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=58348665&build=652081


itkGaussianDistributionTest<http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=itkGaussianDistributionTest&date=2010-06-30>
with more NaNs
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=58348666&build=652081


itkTDistributionTest<http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=itkTDistributionTest&date=2010-06-30>
with more NaNs
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=58348667&build=652081


vnl_test_gamma<http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=vnl_test_gamma&date=2010-06-30>
and more NANs
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=58348663&build=652081


This last four test have in common that
they relate to basic math functions...



I'll give it a shot at building with LLVM on Linux,
but... if there is nothing obvious in the first hour,
I will vote for cutting the release as it is,
and then patching ITK 3.20 for LLVM once
we figure out the source of the problem.



    Any objections ?


           Luis



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>wrote:

> You should send a note to the developers list if your dashboard
> machine changes and disappears from the NightlyExpected. Sometimes we
> notice, but I guess we missed this one.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Sean McBride <sean at rogue-research.com>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:44:08 -0400, Bill Lorensen said:
> >
> >>I guess since they are not on the Nightly Expected builds, we did not
> >>see these. They started failing 13 days ago:
> >>http://www.cdash.org/CDash/index.php?project=Insight&date=2010-06-30
> >>but the changes that day don't seem related to the failures. Did
> >>something change in your environment?
> >
> > In fact, yes.  Between those days we updated that machine from Xcode
> > 3.2.2 to 3.2.3, which updated the compiler from:
> >
> > llvm-gcc 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5646) (LLVM build 2207.5)
> >
> > to
> >
> > llvm-gcc 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2326.10)
> >
> > I always note such changes in the comments at the top of the notes,
> compare:
> >
> > <http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewNotes.php?buildid=651068>
> > <http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewNotes.php?buildid=652081>
> >
> > Though that can be easy to miss.  Is there a procedure there too?
> > Perhaps I should send an email whenever some significant config change
> > is made to a dashboard?
> >
> >>Also, it seems we have a process breakdown. Why aren't these on the
> >>Expected list?
> >
> > What's the correct way for me to request that?  I usually fire an email
> > to someone and it usually gets done, but I may not have for these
> > builds, or the receiver may not have acted up it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Sean McBride, B. Eng                 sean at rogue-research.com
> > Rogue Research                        www.rogue-research.com
> > Mac Software Developer              Montréal, Québec, Canada
> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20100712/2f744f53/attachment.htm>