[Insight-developers] Large IO test for Analyze?

[Luis Ibanez]

Hi Brad,

I vote for adding the test,

and, of course, to enable it only in machines with a certain
amount of RAM, as we did for the other "LargeImage" tests.

We can then give it a try for several days,
to see if it becomes bearable.


   My 2 cents,


        Luis


-------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Bradley Lowekamp
<blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
> Hello,
> I have committed a patch for a large file (>2GB) IO for the analyze file
> format:
> http://www.itk.org/Bug/view.php?id=10135
> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/Code/IO/itkAnalyzeImageIO.cxx?revision=1.103&root=Insight&view=markup
>
> The question I have is should I also add another itkLargeImageWriteReadTest
> for this  io format? These test are rather demanding on a system, and take a
> bit of time too. The current itkLargeImageWriteReadTest are only run on a
> couple of systems due to the large memory requrements. While it would be
> good test it, it may be too much of a burden.
> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=itkLargeImageWriteReadTest3&date=2010-01-26
> Thoughts?
> Brad
>
> ========================================================
>
> Bradley Lowekamp
>
> Lockheed Martin Contractor for
>
> Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
>
> National Library of Medicine
>
> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
>