[Insight-developers] Proposal: Adding ImageCheck class to Insight/Testing/Code/Common

[Luis Ibanez]

Gaetan,

You are right in that no formal decision was made on this topic.

That's why I only mention what my recollection of the discussion was.

The topic has been added to today's tcon agenda.


     Regards,


          Luis


------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Gaëtan Lehmann <
gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr> wrote:

>
> I was thinking no decision was made on that subject - I must have missed
> something :-)
>
>
> Le 12 févr. 09 à 23:27, Luis Ibanez a écrit :
>
>
>
>> Hi Gaetan,
>>
>> My recollection from our previous discussions on other
>> testing frameworks, is that they were too heavy to be
>> made part of ITK, and that they will overlap anyways
>> with existing functionalities of CMake and CTests.
>>
>> Adding support classes for Testing to ITK, and adding
>> CMake support macros seems to be a more effective way
>> of improving the testing framework.
>>
>> The classes that we are proposing here will fill up
>> that void of tools for domain-specific testing.
>>
>> That being said,
>> This is just my recollection of the previous discussion.
>>
>> I'm probably missing many factor here....
>>
>>
>>  Luis
>>
>>
>> --------------------
>> Gaëtan Lehmann wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Luis Ibanez  <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, indeed,
>>>> this suggested class will be one of many to come in a larger
>>>> testing framework. You could imagine similar classes for
>>>> ImageRegions, Indices, Points, Transforms....
>>>>
>>>> Gaëtan Lehmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  However, wouldn't it be better to add this kind of check in a  larger
>>>>>  test framework, as discussed some weeks ago?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  My mail was not clear.
>>> I wanted to talk about the unit test frameworks we discussed some time
>>>  ago, like the one listed here:
>>>  http://www.itk.org/Wiki/Proposals:Increasing_ITK_Code_Coverage
>>> We need this kind of thing for numerical tests for example, so I think
>>>  it would be nice to be consistent for the new check specific to ITK.
>>> Gaëtan
>>>
>>
> --
> Gaëtan Lehmann
> Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
> INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
> tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66    fax: 01 34 65 29 09
> http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr  http://www.mandriva.org
> http://www.itk.org  http://www.clavier-dvorak.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20090213/1102d319/attachment.htm>