[Insight-developers] Anisotropic level sets tests

[Bill Lorensen]

Luca,

I looked at the new results and they certainly look reasonable. I
would say that if you are satisfied that the differences are not bugs,
go ahead and check in the new baselines.

Thanks for all of your hard work,

Bill

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Luca Antiga <luca.antiga at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>  today I worked at making all tests work with the new modifications
> to level sets for support of anisotropic spacings. It looks like
> we're close.
> Today 5 tests were failing. Now, after temporarily reintroducing the
> fudge factor (and fixing a bug), and in the absence of major
> surprises on the dashboard, all tests should pass (except for
> itkVectorThresholdSegmentationLevelSetImageFilterTest, which already
> has a baseline image for the fudge factor-free level set).
> If there aren't objections, tomorrow I'll permanently remove the
> fudge factor (Insight/Code/BasicFilters/
> itkSparseFieldLevelSetImageFilter.txx:991) and provide new baseline
> images for the following tests
>
> CannySegmentationLevelSetImageFilterTest
> LaplacianSegmentationLevelSetImageFilterTest
> ThresholdSegmentationLevelSetGrayMatterTest
> ThresholdSegmentationLevelSetVentricleTest
> ThresholdSegmentationLevelSetWhiteMatterTest
>
> Alternatively, we could back up from our decisions and provide a
> runtime flag to activate/deactivate the fudge factor. This way we
> wouldn't need to provide new baseline images. In my opinion this is a
> worse solution, but it's doable.
>
> Any opinion on this?
>
> Luca
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-developers mailing list
> Insight-developers at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>