[Insight-developers] Test framework

[Bill Lorensen]

I would have picked fortran,

Bill

On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
<mathieu.malaterre at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
>> However, I do admit, that in the case of the new gdcm, that partial
>> specialization is so prevalent that partial specialization cannot be
>> removed. Personally, I think that is unfortunate since reading dicom
>> files does not necessarily require partial specialization. Rather,
>> this is a convenience for the developer.
>
> I could also have written GDCM in assembly. C++ is not a requirement
> to write a DICOM implementation.
>
> --
> Mathieu
>