[Insight-developers] changes in level set routines since ITK 3.4 breaks itk-snap

Luis Ibanez luis.ibanez at kitware.com
Tue Aug 5 19:21:56 EDT 2008


Hi Casey,

Could you please give us a hand by providing a description
of the circumstances in which this error becomes visible ?

E.g. a step-by-step set of instructions will be ideal.

We should then be able to introduce in ITK a new Nightly
test that exercise this same case, and then we can proceed
to fix the problem.


   Thanks for any advice,


       Luis


---------------------
Bill Lorensen wrote:
> Casey,
> 
> Snap is an important ITK customer. We'll work with you to figure out the issues.
> 
> Bill
> 
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Casey Goodlett <gcasey at sci.utah.edu> wrote:
> 
>>It's a functionality change.
>>
>>On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Is this a compilation error or functionality change?
>>>
>>>On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Casey Goodlett <gcasey at sci.utah.edu>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>I have recently compiled itk-snap 1.6.0.1 against the latest version of
>>>>ITK,
>>>>and the automatic segmentation routines in SNAP no longer behave
>>>>correctly.
>>>>When initializing the segmentation routine with a bubble, the bubble
>>>>does
>>>>not get correctly converted into a label map using newer versions of
>>>>ITK,
>>>>and the level set evolution does not behave correctly.  Going back to
>>>>ITK
>>>>3.4 fixes the problem.
>>>>
>>>>I've noticed that there were changes made to the level set routines in
>>>>ITK
>>>>with respect to bug 0006156 (
>>>>http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=6156
>>>>).  I've checked out CVS of ITK before and after these changes and can
>>>>confirm that the problem came about in ITK between 2008-03-01 and
>>>>2008-03-06.
>>>>
>>>>I tried toggling the ITK_DEPRECATED_LEVELSET_INTERPOLATION flag in the
>>>>cmake
>>>>config but there was no effect on the problem.
>>>>
>>>>I'm unsure how to solve the problem so that snap can be used against the
>>>>current version of ITK.  Can someone explain how the behavior of the
>>>>level
>>>>set filters changed?
>>>>
>>>>Thank you
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Casey Goodlett
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Insight-developers mailing list
>>>>Insight-developers at itk.org
>>>>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
> 


More information about the Insight-developers mailing list