[Insight-developers] changes in level set routines since ITK 3.4 breaks itk-snap
Bill Lorensen
bill.lorensen at gmail.com
Tue Aug 5 17:52:59 EDT 2008
Casey,
Snap is an important ITK customer. We'll work with you to figure out the issues.
Bill
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Casey Goodlett <gcasey at sci.utah.edu> wrote:
> It's a functionality change.
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Is this a compilation error or functionality change?
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Casey Goodlett <gcasey at sci.utah.edu>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have recently compiled itk-snap 1.6.0.1 against the latest version of
>> > ITK,
>> > and the automatic segmentation routines in SNAP no longer behave
>> > correctly.
>> > When initializing the segmentation routine with a bubble, the bubble
>> > does
>> > not get correctly converted into a label map using newer versions of
>> > ITK,
>> > and the level set evolution does not behave correctly. Going back to
>> > ITK
>> > 3.4 fixes the problem.
>> >
>> > I've noticed that there were changes made to the level set routines in
>> > ITK
>> > with respect to bug 0006156 (
>> > http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=6156
>> > ). I've checked out CVS of ITK before and after these changes and can
>> > confirm that the problem came about in ITK between 2008-03-01 and
>> > 2008-03-06.
>> >
>> > I tried toggling the ITK_DEPRECATED_LEVELSET_INTERPOLATION flag in the
>> > cmake
>> > config but there was no effect on the problem.
>> >
>> > I'm unsure how to solve the problem so that snap can be used against the
>> > current version of ITK. Can someone explain how the behavior of the
>> > level
>> > set filters changed?
>> >
>> > Thank you
>> >
>> > --
>> > Casey Goodlett
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Insight-developers mailing list
>> > Insight-developers at itk.org
>> > http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>> >
>> >
>
>
More information about the Insight-developers
mailing list