[Insight-developers] ITK not redistributable: copyright statement
incomplete
Luis Ibanez
luis.ibanez at kitware.com
Mon Sep 25 17:41:59 EDT 2006
Hi Steve,
We appreciate your efforts.
It is still a good idea for us to review what kind of
copyrights are currently in the toolkit.
Here is the status of the offending files:
1) DICOMParser: We are testing an experimental build in which
this files are removed. This is a deprecated
set of files that can be removed before ITK 3.0
2) AnalyzeDB.h: Vincent is requesting permission to the Mayo
Clinic for transfering the copyright to ITK
3) PixelData: GE Copyrights,
Vincent is contacting the providers of this
code too.
4) OctreeNode: Vincent will transfer copyright to the ISC.
5) ThresholdMaximumConnectedComponents: Ken Urish is sending
the copyright transfer form to Josh Cates.
The copyfight has already been fixed in the
CVS repository.
6) Netlib: More on netlib at the end of this email...
7) The triangle.c/h and showme.c files have been removed.
Their copyright/license was incompatible with
ITK and their functionality was not needed.
These removed the "itknetlib" library.
8) itk_hash_map: It has copyrights by SGI and HP, but the license
is consistent with BSD-like. So we simply need
to acknowledge those in our general copyright.
9) itkMersenneTwisterRandomVariateGenerator:
Copyright: Makoto Matsumoto and Takuji Nishimura,
Copyright: Richard J. Wagner
under a BSD-Like license.
10) Code/Numerics/FEM/dsrc2c.c :
Copyright: 1977 IMSL Inc, no license !!
11) Code/Numerics/cvsrmvend
Copyright: Greg A. Woods
"Freely distributable"
I guess that counts as BSD...
Easy to remove if it becomes a problem,
This is just a script for making easier
the CVS syncs of VXL.
12) Testing/Code/IO/itkIOHeaderTest.cxx:
Copyright: National Library of Medicine !!!
Actually this is created by the Tcl script
Insight/Utilities/Dart/BuildHeadrTests.tcl
A fix has been commited for this file...
13) Testing/Code/Numerics/NeuralNetworks:
Copyright: CADDLab at UNC
Fixed now in CVS --> ISC
Utilities:
A) JPEG : Thomas G Lane ( BSD-Like)
: DCMTK : OFFIS... and many others... but BSD-Like
B) OpenJPEG : Universite Catholique de Louvain: BSD license
C) NrrdIO : Gordon Kindlmann and University of Utah
BSD-Like license. Clarifies that the original
package "Teem" (not in ITK) is still under GPL license
D) NIFTI : No copyright ?
There is no mention of licensing nor copyright
at the NIFTI Web site:
http://nifti.nimh.nih.gov/nifti-1
However at http://niftilib.sourceforge.net it
appears as "public domain" license!!, but in
its subdirectory matlibs it has a GPL license.
its subdirectory jlibs is public domain
its subdirecotry clibs is public domain
in ITK it has a subdir:
fsliolib : From the FSL package:
University of Oxford: NO FOR COMMERCIAL USE
This code has been removed !
E) EXPAT : Thai Open Source Software Center Ltd and Clark Cooper.
with BSD-Like license
F) PNG : Copyright: Glen Randers-Pehrson
Andreas Dilger
Guy Erc Schalnat
G) TIFF : Copyright Sam Leffler and Silicon Graphics
H) GDCM : Copyright: CREATIS:
I) ZLIB : Copyright: Mark Adler
J) kwsys : Copyright: Kitware : BSD-Like License
---------------------
Steve Robbins wrote:
> Hello Luis,
>
> I'm encouraged by your rapid and robust response. I think the
> Consortium will have no trouble fixing these oversights.
>
> I want to re-iterate, however, that my list is incomplete. I stopped
> checking once it was clear that Debian cannot accept ITK as-is.
> Moreover, I was grepping for copyright notices in the source and
> headers; I did not check for files *missing* copyright and license text
> altogether.
>
> So more work is needed. I'm willing to keep looking when I have time,
> but I'm more than happy to split the work with others! ;-)
>
>
> Quoting Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>:
>
>> 6) Utilities/vxl/v3p/netlib: Netlib and IMSL stuff, no license
>>
>> This one is surprisingly tricky. The web site:
>>
>> www.netlib.org
>>
>> has very sparse information about copyrights and
>> licensing. There is however a LAPACK Debian
>> package already, so we probably only need to
>> add credits to netlib here...
>
>
> Maybe; however, there's a note at the bottom of
> http://netlib.bell-labs.com/netlib/master/readme.html which reads:
>
> Also, the restrictions on copyright, commercial use, etc. vary;
> check each directory for details.
>
> I didn't actually have a look at what is in vxl/v3p/netlib. If it
> includes LAPACK, then why not simply remove it and use the vendor LAPACK?
>
>
> Regards,
> -Steve
>
>
>
More information about the Insight-developers
mailing list