[Insight-developers] itkTestDriver.cxx

[Luis Ibanez]

Yeap,
it makes more sense to move the three of them to

            Insight/Testing/Code/IO


Note that they should go into IO rather than Common
because IO depends on Common and not the other way.

(I was wrong initially suggesting to put it in
  Testing/Code/Common)

We can rework the CMakeLists file so it is always
build regarless of the settings of the BUILD_TESTING
flag.

Gaetan: Would you like to move the files ?
         Would you like me to move them ?

either way is fine with me, just let me know



    Thanks


      Luis



----------------------
Gaëtan Lehmann wrote:
> Le Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:40:50 +0200, Bill Lorensen 
> <wlorens1 at nycap.rr.com>  a écrit:
> 
>> Good point. Testing/Code/Common is probably the best place.
>>
> 
> itkTestDriver is useful only to run tests, However:
>  - it can be used to run tests even if ITK hasn't been built with its  
> tests, for the IJ for example
>  - it is used to run the wrappers tests, and so must be built even if 
> ITK  is built without BUILD_TESTING ON
> Is it easy (and clean) to put it in Testing/Code/Common and built it 
> even  if BUILD_TESTING is OFF ?
> 
>> Bill
>>
>> At 09:47 AM 9/9/2006, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Bill,
>>>
>>> You are right, this is the only executable to reside inside
>>> Insight/Code.
> 
> 
> There is also ImageCompare and ImageCopy :-)
> 
> Gaetan
> 
>>>
>>> Utilities could be an option, but the dependencies will be
>>> reverted, because the typical relationship is that ITKCommon
>>> depend on Utilities.  If we put the executable in Utilities
>>> we will have something that depends on ITKCommon and ITKIO.
>>>
>>> Another option is to put it in Insight/Testing/Code, in any
>>> case, ImageCompare is only needed if Testing is ON...
>>>
>>>
>>>    Luis
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------
>>> Lorensen, William E (GE, Research) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Luis and Gaetan,
>>>> Is Code/IO the proper location for itkTestDriver.cxx? There are no  
>>>> other executables built in Insgiht/Code.
>>>> Perhaps it should reside in Utilities?
>>>> Bill
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Insight-developers mailing list
>>>> Insight-developers at itk.org
>>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Insight-developers mailing list
>>> Insight-developers at itk.org
>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Insight-developers mailing list
>> Insight-developers at itk.org
>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> 
> 
> 
>