[Insight-developers] RE: Complex vs f2c.h, "real" symbol conflicts in gcc 2.95

[Brad King]

Lorensen, William E (Research) wrote:
> Done!

Thanks.  I've updated and closed the bug report:

http://public.kitware.com/Bug/bug.php?op=show&bugid=1908&pos=0

to include this change.

-Brad

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brad King [mailto:brad.king at kitware.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 4:28 PM
> To: Lorensen, William E (Research)
> Cc: Gaetan Lehmann; William A. Hoffman; insight-developers at itk.org; Luis
> Ibanez
> Subject: Re: [Insight-developers] RE: Complex vs f2c.h, "real" symbol
> conflicts in gcc 2.95
> 
> 
> Brad King wrote:
> 
>>Gaetan Lehmann wrote:
>>
>>
>>>If you edit all that code, won't it break building with system vxl ?
>>
>>
>>Good point.  We'd have to contribute this "fix" back to vxl.  I'll bring 
>>it up with them, but meanwhile does anyone have another suggestion?
> 
> 
> On second thought this is not actually a vxl problem.  No where is the 
> f2c header actually included by the netlib header.  It is just an 
> internal implementation detail in source files where they deal with this 
> problem already.  This is a problem for ITK only in code that includes 
> f2c.h, which is a few .cxx files.  I had not realized this before.
> 
> Bill, I think your #define solution in those few FEM .cxx files is the 
> way to go.  Please commit those changes.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Brad
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-developers mailing list
> Insight-developers at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers